received the complaint from CW 1 Dhavalachandra the
Investigating Officer of EIPR Company regarding selling of
spurious regulators in the name of Crompton and Greaves ... obtained report from CW 5 Satish Kumar the General
Manager of EIPR Company about seized regulators as whether
they are original or duplicate. He recorded
with the charge-sheet are either police witnesses or
the officials of EIPR, TVS Motor Co. Ltd., Copyrights Registry etc. The
testimonies of these witnesses ... based on the complaint filed by Sh. Sanjay Kumar, official of EIPR,
authorized by the company to lodge the complaint and testify in the
matter
material, initiated the present proceedings through
one Surender Kumar, an officer of EIPR. Sh. Rattan Pal Singh, a senior
Investigator from EIPR, was also cited ... appeared on 14.01.2026.
Even PW Ratan Pal Singh, who was also from EIPR, had not appeared
despite timely service of summons. This court had noted
complaint filed by Sh. Rajesh Kumar, Authorized
Representative of M/s EIPR. The prosecution sought to prove that the
seized goods were 'colorable imitations ... come to identify
the signature of Sh. Gulfaraz Makhani, Director, M/s EIPR, on the
Authorization Letter issued in favour of the complainant, who worked
Officer, registered the FIR.
6. PW2 is Manjeet Singh, AR of the EIPR (India Ltd.) who was
authorized by the complainant company ... proved any
authority letter to show that he was authorized by EIPR to file this
case.
21. He has further not produced any Board Resolution
notarized copy of letter of
authority issued by Mr. Viren Popli to EIPR India Pvt. Ltd. where
he correctly identifies the signatures of Mr. Viren ... certificate of training issued by Mr. Viren Popli to employees
of EIPR India Pvt. Ltd. where he correctly identifies
EIPR.§§-$EF€TE§} BY {T25 rSEZ{iRiE
various documents, copy of affidavit of
Mr.Ravi Pawar, an employee of EIPR India Ltd who had made the
investigation and affidavit of Mr. Sunil
M/S. S.N.R. Dhall Mill vs M/S. Kaleesuwari Refinary Private ... on 27
case of the plaintiffs that the plaintiff No. 2 through its
Agents EIPR India Limited, immediately on becoming aware of the
defendants' activities lodged
