examined only one witness by name Satish Kumar
the representative of EIPR company as PW.1. The testimony of
P.W.1 indicating that ... though the prosecution has examined
only witness who is the representative of EIPR Company and
he deposed regarding seized products as counterfeit, his
evidence
various documents, copy of affidavit of
Mr.Ravi Pawar, an employee of EIPR India Ltd who had made the
investigation and affidavit of Mr. Sunil
case of the plaintiffs that the plaintiff No. 2 through its
Agents EIPR India Limited, immediately on becoming aware of the
defendants' activities lodged
categorically
admitted that Ex.P.1 was in the letter head of EIPR.
Further accused No.1 and 2 success in get admission from
leather
pouches are counterfeit in the different brand names over
which EIPR group of companies had copyright. Further, the
prosecution has to prove that
copyright of the said company. Hence, CW.1 - Harish
Kumar - EIPR Company lodged first information. The Station
House Officer registered a case
