Mumbai
Ex DW3A Evidence of DW3 Nanga
Ex DW3/2 EP 0477700 A1 dated 28.9.2010
Ex DW3/3 US 4138590 dated ... Getitinib -wiki article
Ex. D-2 EP0635507 A1
Ex D-3 EP 0566226 B1
Ex D-4 Article Isosterism & molecular -----
by CW Thornber
sake of completeness, to
reproduce the same:-
“1. Misc. Case (EP) No.1 of 2012 as preliminary objection on the ground
of maintainability of Election ... same is pending.
2. Misc. Case (EP) No. 4 of 2012 for amendment of his application in
Misc. Case (EP
patent. Such admissions were made by the plaintiffs in European
Patent Office (EP 1654263) as well. In the said application, plaintiffs have
admitted that suit ... raised by the European Patent Office to the grant of
European Patent (EP 1654263) to Merck and Co. Inc for Sitagliptin
Phosphate Monohydrate
M/S Andritz Hydro Private Limited ... vs The Acit 1(1), Bhopal on 28 February
Commissioner Of Customs (Ep), Mumbai vs Prayag Exporters Pvt. Ltd. on 8 April, 2003
Equivalent citations: 2003(155)ELT4(SC), AIRONLINE
opposed the request of the respondent - decree-holder in execution
petition (EP) on the ground that the decree-holder without exhausting
the remedy available ... under law, is disentitled to file the EP for
sale of the petition schedule property, the executing Court, having
found that there was no substance
producing substances that cause
cancer. The defendants has quoted three examples of EP
0412404, US 5,668,161 and WO 98/28282 to show that ... support of their
submission, the details are given as under :-
i) EP 0412404 (EP '404) - discloses many amino-thiazole
compounds for treatment of cancer
ep ... ep
Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 , hereinafter referred to
as “the EP Act ” was also enacted pursuant to the decisions taken at
the United Nations Conference ... Statement of Objects and Reasons
for enactment of the EP Act , the said Act has been prompted by
concern over the environment, that has grown
balance
sheet, showing the basic and diluted earning per share
(hereinafter ‘EPS’) as Rs. 15.91 per share, was correct.
2.3 However, the Trial Court rejected ... tenancy served by
2
The Trial Court had erroneously stated that the ‘EPS’ was 10,36,400,
perhaps because the heading of Column 12 states
