election petition (38/2015) filed
by the respondent-election petitioner (hereinafter the EP')
challenging the election of the petitioner-returned candidate
(hereinafter ... Election) Rules, 1994 (hereinafter `the Rules of
1994') by the EP inter alia alleging that the RC had sired a third child
Meena Vs. Gheesi Meena, filed by
the respondent-Election Petitioner (hereinafter the EP') challenging
the election of the petitioner-returned candidate (hereinafter ... Having secured highest votes she was declared elected
as Sarpanch. The respondent EP laid an election petition challenging
RC's election under Section
petition (6/2015) filed by the respondent-Election Petitioner
(hereinafter the EP') was allowed and the election of the RC as
Sarpanch of Village ... Having secured highest votes she was declared elected.
The respondent EP laid an election petition challenging the RC's
election under Section
challenge by the respondent-
election petitioner (hereinafter `the EP') under Section 43 of the Act
of 1994 read with Rule 80 of the Rajasthan ... kdkjh gS \
4- vuqrks'k \
The EP examined herself as AW-1 and exhibited 12
documents. The RC except for herself despite several opportunities
whereby the election petition filed by the
respondent-election petitioner (hereinafter `the EP') was allowed,
election of the RC as Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat ... secured
949 votes as against 775 votes cast for the EP, was declared elected as
Sarpanch. The EP then challenged the RC's election
Laxmi & others , filed by the respondent-Election Petitioner
2
(hereinafter the EP') challenging the election of the petitioner-
returned candidate (hereinafter ... Election) Rules, 1994 (hereinafter `the
Rules of 1994') by the EP inter alia alleging that the RC had sired
three children; Shivani
whereunder the election petition filed by the respondent-election
petitioner (hereinafter the EP') challenging the election of the
petitioner-returned candidate (hereinafter ... Election) Rules,
1994 (hereinafter `the Rules of 1994') by the EP inter alia alleging
that the RC on the date of filing of nomination
which allowed the election
petition filed by the election petitioner (hereinafter `the EP') against
2
the returned candidate (hereinafter `the RC') setting aside ... case are that an election petition was
filed by the EP against the RC alleging that the RC despite her
ineligibility to contest the election
District Dausa.
The facts of the case are that the election petitioner (EP)
filed a petition on 4-2-2015 before the trial court challenging ... election to the post of Sarpanch was claimed by
the EP to be liable to be set aside on the said ground. The election
petition
election petition laid by the
petitioners-election petitioners (for short 'EP') against the
respondent no.1-returned candidate (for short ... been
dismissed.
Brief facts of the case are that EPs and RC contested
the elections held for the post of Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat
