Bombay held that passing of an order
on merits by the ITAT even when the impugned order was
passed ex-parte amounts to violation ... order where the assessee has also complied
during the process of litigation. In case, where the order of
the Ld. CIT(Appeals) itself is
Bombay held that passing of an order
on merits by the ITAT even when the impugned order was
passed ex-parte amounts to violation ... order where the assessee has also complied
during the process of litigation. In case, where the order of
the Ld. CIT(Appeals) itself is
Bombay held that passing of an order
on merits by the ITAT even when the impugned order was
passed ex-parte amounts to violation ... order where the assessee has also complied
during the process of litigation. In case, where the order of
the Ld. CIT(Appeals) itself is
Bombay held that passing of an order
on merits by the ITAT even when the impugned order was
passed ex-parte amounts to violation ... order where the assessee has also complied
during the process of litigation. In case, where the order of
the Ld. CIT(Appeals) itself is
para 1.1, 8 and 9 of the said order. The
findings proving the order passed on exparte basis are extracted as under:
1.1 The notices ... Bombay held that
passing of an order on merits by the ITAT even when the impugned order was
passed ex-parte amounts to violation
Bombay held
that passing of an order on merits by the ITAT even when the impugned order was
passed ex-parte amounts to violation ... order where the assessee has also
complied during the process of litigation. In case, where the order of the Ld.
CIT(Appeals) itself is
Bombay held that passing of an order
on merits by the ITAT even when the impugned order was
passed ex-parte amounts to violation ... order where the assessee has also complied
during the process of litigation. In case, where the order of
the Ld. CIT(Appeals) itself is
Bombay held that passing of an order on merits by the
ITAT even when the impugned order was passed ex-parte amounts to violation ... order
where the assessee has also complied during the process of litigation. In case,
where the order of the Ld. CIT(Appeals) itself is
Bombay held that passing of an order on merits by the ITAT
even when the impugned order was passed ex-parte amounts
to violation ... order
where the assessee has also complied during the process of
litigation. In case, where the order of the Ld. CIT(Appeals) itself
is
Bombay held that passing of an order on merits by the ITAT
even when the impugned order was passed ex-parte amounts
to violation ... order
where the assessee has also complied during the process of
litigation. In case, where the order of the Ld. CIT(Appeals) itself
is
