Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 124 (0.03 seconds)

Mr. S K Jasra vs Union Of India on 10 September, 2013

sexually inappropriate behaviour, generally, there are no direct/documentary evidences or independent eyewitnesses other than the alleged harasser and the harassed. v) On the basis ... contention. Moreover, SW-4s deposition is not in a capacity of eyewitness but rather as a direct recipient of Smt. Nirmala Devis sharing
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

New India Assurance Company Ltd. vs Prashant Rana on 11 June, 2021

case of inconsistency between the medical evidence and evidence given by eyewitnesses, the evidence of the eyewitnesses cannot be thrown out. On the basis ... case of inconsistency between the medical evidence and evidence given by eyewitnesses, the evidence of the eyewitnesses cannot be thrown out. 13.              Thus, from
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sri Sailendra Behari Kakati vs City Nursing Home, Represented By Dr. ... on 21 August, 2017

medical negligence, for proper adjudication of the case, the evidence of the eyewitness (Sri Hiteswar Medhi) is very much essential.           On the otherhand, the learned ... allowing the complainants to adduce additional evidence after having found the eyewitness of the incident and as such, the present petition is not maintainable
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

National Insurance Company Ltd vs Mrs. Vaishali Murlidharji Kawre on 14 November, 2025

conclusion that the deceased committed suicide is not acceptable without any eyewitness evidence. Until eyewitness evidence is presented, it cannot be concluded that the deceased ... opposite insurance company has concluded that the deceased committed suicide without any eyewitness evidence. 21. Hence in our considered view the grounds on which appellant
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Abhishek Verma vs Comm. Of Police on 18 May, 2023

driver as also to record his statement, as he was the main eyewitness of the case, which were mandatory for registering an FIR. He casually ... statement of the owner of the truck without calling the eyewitness for registering his statement, which clearly shows a lackadaisical attitude on the part
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next