former person was, and the latter person was not, guilty of fraudulent misrepresentation. (6) For the purposes of this section- (a) the expression "promoter" means
liable-was, and that other person was not, guilty of fraudulent misrepresentation. (5) For the purposes of this section— (a) the expression " promoter " means
respondent No. 1 was induced to enter into the agreement by fraudulent misrepresentation and deceitful intent, the respondent No. 1 did not repudiate the contract ... written statement filed in the Bombay Suit the distributor alleged fraudulent misrepresentation on the part of the producer with regard to the agreement
parties, the trial Court framed issue No. 5 with regard to fraudulent: misrepresentation and fraud, placing the burden of proof on the plaintiffs, who examined ... deed of partition Ex. D.6 acting in a fraudulent manner and on fraudulent misrepresentation.
38. The partition deed Ex. D.6 is executed
been sustained by the appellant as a result of the alleged fraudulent misrepresentation made by the respondent Board in publishing false figures of estimated cost ... said to have been caused on account of the alleged fraudulent misrepresentation, and in the alternative, on account of deductions made on the basis
question is, what would be the legal position if there is
fraudulent misrepresentation not merely as to the contents of the
document ... legal position will be different if there is a
fraudulent misrepresentation not merely as to the
contents of the document but as to its character
legal position will be different if there is a fraudulent misrepresentation not
merely as to the contents of the document but as to its character ... make a clear distinction between fraudulent misrepresentation as to the character of
the document and fraudulent misrepresentation as to the contents thereof. With
reference
qualifies "misrepresentation" the result would be that
due diligence would be required in the case where
misrepresentation became fraudulent, but would ... alone go with the word "fraudulent", thus not applying to cases of
fraudulent misrepresentation. In John Minas Apcar v. Louis Caird
Malchus
Court. According to him, even if it is assumed that a
fraudulent misrepresentation would have occurred, it would only
make the document voidable and hence ... distinction between fraudulent representation
as to the character of the document and fraudulent
misrepresentation as to the contents thereof has been
distinctively described and with
dismissed by the Adjudicating Authority
having found no misrepresentation or fraudulent
misrepresentation in issuing Information Memorandum calling for the
expression of interest for submitting insolvency ... resolution
professional fraudulently misrepresented the production capacity of
the industry i.e. Corporate Debtor and on the basis of such
fraudulent misrepresentation, the appellants were