well settled that misrepresentation itself amounts to fraud. Indeed, innocent misrepresentation may also give reason to claim relief against fraud. A fraudulent misrepresentation is called
held as follows:
" Contract Act, 1872 Ss.17 to 19 Fraudulent misrepresentation Document/transaction when void and when voidable Held, when fraudulent misrepresentation ... false to say that the sale deed was obtained fraudulently and on misrepresentation. Further, D.W.1-Chembakavalli in her cross examination has deposed that
well settled that misrepresentation itself amounts to fraud. Indeed, innocent misrepresentation may also give reason to claim relief against fraud. A fraudulent misrepresentation is called ... owner of share and to cancel transfer of shares obtained by misrepresentation or fraud in favour of transferees, the jurisdiction to take cognizance lies exclusively
well settled that misrepresentation itself amounts to fraud. Indeed, innocent misrepresentation may also give reason to claim relief against fraud. A fraudulent misrepresentation is called ... England, a representation is deemed to have been false, and therefore a misrepresentation, if it was at the material date false in substance
contents or legal effect of the documents but extended to fraudulent misrepresentation as to character of the document itself. The sale deed so executed
held as follows:
Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 17 to 19 - Fraudulent misrepresentation - Document/transaction when void and when voidable - Held, when fraudulent misrepresentation is with ... false to say that the sale deed was obtained fraudulently and on misrepresentation. Further, D.W.1-Chembakavalli in her cross examination has deposed that
Respondent/Land Lord with an ulterior motive has made a fraudulent misrepresentation before the Learned Rent Controller as well as the Learned Appellate Authority falsely
Respondent/Claimant had avoided the Agreement mainly due to the fraudulent concealment and misrepresentation of the facts by the Appellant/Petitioner.
41. This Court
fraud or misrepresentation. Nor is the case before us one where there is an allegation of presentation of forged or fraudulent documents.'
He also
shown that such order was obtained by playing fraud and misrepresentation. The question of applicability of law of limitation to exercise such inherent power ... administrative authorities does not arise because fraud unravels every thing rendering a fraudulent order void and non-existent. This principle in a different manner
