Recovery Tribunal (DRT) at Ernakulam, the
1st respondent, by the impugned order dated 04.01.2021, has
entrusted the charge of DRT to DRT-II, Bangalore. This ... time being in force to discharge the function of Presiding Officer of
a DRT under the Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993, in
addition
BADAR
Friday,the 9th day of April 2021/19th Chaithra, 1943
OP (DRT) No.36/2021
SA No.116/2021 of the DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL ... with stay petition challenging the auction notice. But as the
DRT-II is not functional, the petition could not be heard by the learned DRT
KALIPPANKULAM, KAMALESWARAN,
MANACAUD P.O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 009.
OP (DRT) 38/2021 2/2
OP (Debt Recovery Tribunal) praying inter alia that in the circumstances ... application before
DRT- II Ernakulam challenging the notice at Exhibit P7 with the stay application.
However, as the DRT is not functioning, his application could
pending before the learned DRT. But
the petitioner is approaching this Court only because the learned DRT is
not functioning.
I am afraid, without substantive
above OP(DRT).
This petition again coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and the affidavit
filed in support of OP (DRT) and this court ... DRT. He has also filed application for
amendment of stay petition. Stay petition is pending before DRT. The DRT is not
functioning. In the meanwhile
Ernakulam was not functioning due to non sitting
of the Tribunal. Now it is reported that the
Tribunal has started functioning.
2. The learned Senior ... Debt Recovery Tribunal was not functioning.
In this view of the matter, as the Tribunal
started functioning, the original petition is
ordered by directing
DRT).
This petition coming on for admission upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed
in support of OP (DRT) and upon hearing the arguments ... Ernakulam. But
that forum is not functioning. The petitioner therefore seeks stay of the proceedings under
OP (DRT) 37/2021 2/2
the SARFAESI
