Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

ITDEPT and Reserve Prices which is then 3 T1 60 vetted by GFIL Committee IT DEPT Tender approval from Department which is then ... days (T2) vetted by 10 GFIL Committee Phase 2: Publication of 4 T2 + 5 days SBICAPS Auction RFP 5 Conducting Pre- T2 + 20 days SBICAPS

Extent under LA for Extent under Net area NO. Village Parcels GFIL land as per various Purposes others with GFIL Records possession/L ess extent ... further submitted that since the GFIL lands are covered by the huge trees and bushes therefore, for demarcation of the boundaries of each parcel

Income Tax Department and Ms. Suruchi Aggarwal, learned senior counsel for the GFIL Committee to sit together and decide the modalities to be observed ... Ahuja, former District Judge and a member of the GFIL Committee, seeks to be relieved. We nominate Mr. K.K. Kareer (Cell

supra). Paragraph No. 14 reads as under:- "14. In Committee-GFIL v. Libra Buildtech (P) Ltd. [Committee-GFIL v. Libra Buildtech

paragraph Nos. 14 to 17 held as under:- "14. Committee-GFIL v. Libra Buildtech Private Limited and Ors. , wherein the issue of refund

judgments passed by Hon'ble Supreme Court in The Committee-GFIL versus Libra Buildtech Private Limited and others , 2016 ( 1) RCR (Civil ... judgments passed by Hon'ble Supreme Court in The Committee- GFIL 's case ( Supra) and Bano Saiyed Parwaz 's case (Supra). However

relevant. For easy understanding, they are reproduced hereinbelow:- "14. In Committee-GFIL v. Libra Buildtech (P) Ltd.2 , wherein the issue of refund

discussed above. 16. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in The Committee-GFIL v. Libra Buildtech Private Ltd. & Ors. , 2015(16) SCC 31 while ... Supreme Court, while referring to its earlier judgment in The Committee-GFIL v. Libra Buildtech Private Ltd. & Ors. (supra), observed in paragraph 15 that

where the Hon'ble Apex Court noted the decision of Committee-GFIL vs Libra Buildtech (P) Ltd. in paragraph 14 as under ... Committee-GFIL v. Libra Buildtech (P) Ltd.2 , wherein the issue of refund of stamp duty under the same Act was in question, this Court