IVf¢§'?%$?fi&2i'_1'&1.._%R3.¢:';*;' pléxintiff in
the triad court, Rathnakafa'-E130'é~V.@%.:_»RLé
statement ef
{)bjf'3Cl£iC}I1S filed by the respondent» management..iVf:-tlxas
been contended that Sr: R. Vekatesh has 0-
frem service after
relied upon several judgments which "ll shall refer:to;.:'._'ivf__need be, in the
course of the order. * -- . ' ' . '
Appellants
Syndicate Bank vs Y R Shenoy S/O Late Y N Shenoy on 25 May
fianyiag 'baséiwagéa 333$ Rise
€3{}§'Q'§Eff;i£;"§*€iVf"i;§i4:3§ begasféig 3:; ifirii Peiitéagg
Oihfif c0:2n$£:€l§§'i}§f;°i: §&ivf?fii:;::3 :'dé§$§:{>;3§«:%; off
:33 232,216 E2 E3}; ihe Frégcépgé gasg
éar "$565565? 3,73 of
._"'~g.iVfe
2eVz';_.{§3,gé's:3
irregularities committed iVf'i~.V ."f*€CO?"dV§TlgV {E29 piéa and
examination
CGEERT C3? '§§é§Z Ciifii :j'§§§{}E §j§}E\EEOR
§iVfS£€3?~§} 3; JEXIEFC BELUR A'? BELUR,
i
E
THIS VJRIT
K Kariyanna S/O Kodhi Rangappa vs Shrishma Fine Chemicals & ... on 31 January, 2012