depending upon the facts in each case. It is further note-worthy that in case the Labour Commissioner issues certificate, and the Collector after realizing ... facts in each case.
It is further note-worthy that in case, after holding enquiry, as mentioned above, the Labour Commissioner issues certificate, then
Industrial Disputes Act before the Labour court. The case has been contested by the respondents and after hearing the parties vide impugned order dated ... Labour Court and the Labour Court shall determine the amount after considering the report of the Commissioner and other circumstances of the case
Bank had adopted unfair labour practice, it would be useful to examine the definition of unfair labour practice. Unfair Labour Practice is defined in Section ... unfair labour practice. In other words, before an action can be treated as an unfair labour practice it would be necessary for the Labour Court
before the labourer is stark hunger.
The 'bonded labour system' as defined in section 2(g) of the Bonded Labour (System) Abolition ... bonded labourers, they are even found helping the keepers of bonded labourers to arrange the dispersal and disappearance of bonded labour after hurriedly settling their
respondent no. 2, Labour Court, Rampur. Before the Labour Court the parties had filed their written statements. The Labour Court by its award dated ... judgments it emerges that the finding recorded by the Labour Court in the present case and its power to record a different finding cannot
investigating the disputed questions of facts or law. In the first case, the Labour Commissioner is not called upon to give any reason while issuing ... certificate. In the second case, the Labour Commissioner has to give reasons as to why according to him, pleas raised are untenable. No finding
petitioner raised an industrial dispute which was referred to the Labour Court as Adjudication Case No. 284 of 1994 and the question referred ... case and the law laid down by the Supreme Court, the Adjudication Case No. 284 of 1994 before the Labour Court was therefore not maintainable
employer despite order passed by the Presiding Officer, labour court in cases which were decided by the award dated 6.11.2003.
Workman Ram Ratan in adjudication ... said log book.
The Presiding Officer of the labour court, in the case of Ram Ratan, in his award dated 12.12.2003 has recorded that
Petitioner has challenged the order dated 26.10.1996, passed by the Labour Court Faizabad in Case No. 22 of 1994 under Section ... instant case is legally maintainable under Section 33-C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act?"
Petitioner's case before the Labour Court
months i.e. April and May, 1995 before the Labour Court, the labour court was compelled to draw an adverse inference in terms of Section ... respondent workman having produced some evidence in support of his case, the labour court committed no error in drawing adverse inference against the petitioner
