numbered as ID No.6/2011.
7. In the said case, the Labour Court held that
the enquiry held by the Corporation was not fair ... Labour Court for
9
adjudication. In the said case, admittedly the Labour
Court has held that the enquiry held by the
Corporation was not fair
Court failed to consider the facts and
circumstances of the case. That the Labour Court misread
the material and evidence on record. On considering ... aside. That based on the facts and
circumstances of the case, the Labour Court committed an
error in granting only 50% backwages. In view
PASSED BY LABOUR
COURT, MYSORE ON 27.8.2011, IN REF. No. 23/05, QUASH AND
SET-ASIDE THE AWARD DATED 27.8.2011 PASSED BY LABOUR
COURT, MYSORE ... pronouncement of
the Apex Court in State of Gujarath 's case supra, Labour
Court did not have the jurisdiction to pass the award
impugned
labour practice, the
Labour Courthas no power to interfere with the
punishment imposed. Section 11-A of the Act
gives ample power to the Labour ... unfair labour
practice etc., on the part of the management.
There is no allegation of unfair labour practice,
victimization et., in this case. The powers
labour practice, the
Labour Courthas no power to interfere with the
punishment imposed. Section 11-A of the Act
gives ample power to the Labour ... unfair labour
practice etc., on the part of the management.
There is no allegation of unfair labour practice,
victimization et., in this case. The powers
towards labour and like
charges. Hence, he claims that deduction of labour
charges with gross profit even in case of standard
rate/percentage is admissible ... deduction of 27.44% of the
gross profit on labour charges.
12. In the instant case, the appellant had executed
various works contracts during the relevant
Muster Rule may be destroyed. Here is a case
wherein the petitioner has not approached the Labour
Court within a reasonable time. On the other ... situation arising in the present case.
Similar is the view taken by the Apex Court in the case
of Assistant Executive Engineer, Karnataka Vs.
Shivalinga
2013 ON THE FILE OF THE
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-
LABOUR COURT AT BANGALORE AND ETC.,
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY
HEARING ... Labour
3
Court, Bangalore, (for short 'Labour Court), wherein it
has been numbered as CR.No.10/2013. In the said
case, the Labour
transfer unauthorisedly absent. In other words, the
Labour Court held that the misconduct proved.
However, the Labour Court having noticed that Puttaiah
served the organization ... petition is:
"Whether in the facts and circumstances of
the case the Labour Court was justified in
invoking Sec.11-A of the Industrial
This evidence is being relied by MW.1 before
the Labour Court. The Labour Court has not given
much importance to the evidence ... regard to the totality of the facts and
circumstances of the case, the Labour Court on facts
has concluded in favour of the workman
