passed by
the respondent No.1 i.e. Commissioner of Labour,
Gandhinagar in conciliation case No.103 of 2023 and
conciliation case ... contractors entered into long-term
settlement with the contract labourers.
4.2. It is the case of the petitioner that Respondent No.2
has earlier raised
issued to quash and set aside impugned award
dated 18.05.2018 passed by Labour Court, Godhra, in
Page 1 of 46
Uploaded by ANUSRI VASU(HC02352 ... passed by the Labour Court made by the State under
Article 226 of the Constitution of India, while dealing with
the case of Bhadar Canal
continuous until he reached age of
superannuation. In the present case the labour court has rightly
passed the order of reinstatement however the labour court ... petitioner and therefore, Labour Court ought not to
have passed order of reinstatement. It is urged that the Award
passed by labour court is contrary
continuous until he
reached age of superannuation. In the present case the Labour
Court has rightly passed the order of reinstatement however the
Labour court ... petitioner and therefore, Labour Court ought not to have
passed order of reinstatement. It is urged that the Award passed
by labour court is contrary
approach the Labour Court under
Section 33(C)(2) , which specifically empowers the Labour
Court to undertake computation and in present case the
petitioner ... hesitation in setting aside the order
passed by the Labour Court in Misc. Case No. 11 of 1993
dated 23.08.1995 and the order dated
approach the Labour Court under
Section 33(C)(2) , which specifically empowers the Labour
Court to undertake computation and in present case the
petitioner ... hesitation in setting aside the order
passed by the Labour Court in Misc. Case No. 11 of 1993
dated 23.08.1995 and the order dated
approach the Labour Court under
Section 33(C)(2) , which specifically empowers the Labour
Court to undertake computation and in present case the
petitioner ... hesitation in setting aside the order
passed by the Labour Court in Misc. Case No. 11 of 1993
dated 23.08.1995 and the order dated
Welfare
Sub-Division was examined on 22.8.2008 before the
Labour Court. The Labour Court, therefore, observed that
though the witness was aware of the facts ... retrenchment."
31. Considering all the aspects, the Labour Court held that the
case of the respondent - workman was not under Section
court below Exh.21 which was filed in the case of
mother being reference case No.93 of 2017 which was
heard alongwith the present ... orally on 03.12.2016.
However, attendance register produced before the
learned labour court falsifies the case and concluded
that the workman has worked
petitioners prayed for quashing and setting aside
proceedings of Criminal Case No.239 of 2012 filed by the
respondent No.2 pending before the learned ... would further submit that prior to lodging of
the private complaint, labour case was lodged with the Labour
Court and the same has been disposed
