Bodies and Education Cases page 56 : 1984 (48) FLR-315 relying on the case of Grindlavs Bank (supra) held that Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal retains ... that the facts of that case were totally different than that of the present case and in that case there was no Presiding Officer posted
parties filed their respective counter and rejoinder statements before the Labour Court. The case of the worker before the labour Court was that ... employer also submitted documentary evidence in support of their case in the proceedings before the labour court. The workman given his oral evidence
Vidyut Parishad Inter College, Panki, Kanpur.
The case of the petitioner before the Labour Court was that there was no post of Lab Assistant ... case, there is no comparison of the cases given by respondent No. 2.
7. It is submitted that the Labour Court has already given
Education Cases page 56 : 1984(48) FLR- 315 relying on the case of Grindlays Bank Case 1981 SC-606 held that Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal ... Education Cases page 56 : 1984(48) FLR 315 relying on the case of Grindlays Bank Case 1981 SC-606 held that Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal
where it was registered as adjudication case No. 243/94.
5. The case of the workman before the Labour Court was that during the aforesaid ... summoning those records and ought to have proved his case before the labour Court. No reason has been given by the labour Court for simply
which was registered as Adjudication Case No. 367 of 1998.
4. The case of the workman before the Labour Court was that he was suffering ... respondents without issuing tickets to them.
5. The case of the employer before the Labour Court was that the workman had accepted the money therefore
petition is directed against an Award passed by Labour Court, Rampur dated 23.4.1999 in Adjudication Case No. 127 of 1991. The aforesaid award has been ... Anya Kin Vivrano Sahit.
The reference was registered by the Labour Court as Adjudication Case No. 127 of 1991. On receipt of summons from
been reinstated by the management and that the case of the worker before the labour court was also that several fresh hands were appointed after ... days of continuous service.
8. It was also the case of the employer before the labour court that due to seizure of work of machine
Case No. 96/1991 in support of their respective case. The evidence on facts in respect of each of the workmen before the Labour Court ... following the prescribed procedure of recruitment. However, in the instant case the Tribunal/Labour Court has given a categorical finding of fact that the petitioners
permanent workman. In their rejoinder affidavit, the employers case before the labour Court was that the petitioner workman was only a temporary employee ... organizing the labour employed in the factory cannot be termed as unfair labour practice. In this backdrop, the labour court recorded findings of fact
