reopening of assessments.
However, the present case is not a case of change of opinion but is a case of omission in the Award ... reference made to the Labour Court has been considered and adjudicated upon and answered by the Labour Court, the Labour Court cannot exercise its power
said misc. cases were consolidated, and Misc. Case No. 193 of 2000 was made the leading case.
15. The Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kanpur (respondent ... said misc. cases were consolidated, and Misc. Case No. 193 of 2000 was made the leading case.
79. Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Kanpur (respondent
Bodies and Education Cases page 56 : 1984 (48) FLR-315 relying on the case of Grindlavs Bank (supra) held that Labour Court/Industrial Tribunal retains ... that the facts of that case were totally different than that of the present case and in that case there was no Presiding Officer posted
period where no duty is discharged. In the cases where the employee is governed by various labour welfare legislations, payment of wages in certain contingencies ... dichotomy of the judicial pronouncements in the matters dealing with labour cases and those dealing with government service inasmuch as in the labour matters since
sustainable after the reference was made by the Government. In that case, the Labour Court granted the relief, but the same was denied ... before the Labour Court. Still the Labour Court having found that there was delay on the part of workman in approaching the Labour Court
particular case, as a little difference in facts can make Uma Devi's case (supra) inapplicable to the facts of that case." While ... there is no post no regularisation could be ordered. In that case the labour court had given its award on the basis that the respondent
CASUAL LABOURS
Orders have been issued by DoT for regularising Ayas and all casual labourers including part time casual labourers. Left out cases ... casual labourers, the part time casual labourers will not be converted into full time labourers.
4. Payment to the above full time casual labourers
record of the case.
3. The facts of the case are that the respondent workmen raised a claim before the Labour Court that their services ... statements had been made.
11. In order to establish their case before the Labour Court, the petitioner had filed application dated 24.7.1991 before the Presiding
unfair labour practice being followed by the appellant or that the appellant had indulged in unfair labour practice was also incorrect. Unfair labour practice ... unfair labour practice. In other words, before an action can be termed as an unfair labour practice it would be necessary for the Labour Court
parties filed their respective counter and rejoinder statements before the Labour Court. The case of the worker before the labour Court was that ... employer also submitted documentary evidence in support of their case in the proceedings before the labour court. The workman given his oral evidence
