Heard learned counsel for the appellants in first
LPA No. 104 of 2020. LPA is not maintainable by the appellant
Mr. Rabindra Prasad ... circumstances, the
appellant in LPA No. 104 of 2020 stands rejected on the score
that LPA is not maintainable against the order of the learned
Heard learned counsel for the appellants in first
LPA No. 104 of 2020. LPA is not maintainable by the appellant
Mr. Rabindra Prasad ... circumstances, the
appellant in LPA No. 104 of 2020 stands rejected on the score
that LPA is not maintainable against the order of the learned
Heard learned counsel for the appellants in first
LPA No. 104 of 2020. LPA is not maintainable by the appellant
Mr. Rabindra Prasad ... circumstances, the
appellant in LPA No. 104 of 2020 stands rejected on the score
that LPA is not maintainable against the order of the learned
Heard learned counsel for the appellants in first
LPA No. 104 of 2020. LPA is not maintainable by the appellant
Mr. Rabindra Prasad ... circumstances, the
appellant in LPA No. 104 of 2020 stands rejected on the score
that LPA is not maintainable against the order of the learned
Heard learned counsel for the appellants in first
LPA No. 104 of 2020. LPA is not maintainable by the appellant
Mr. Rabindra Prasad ... circumstances, the
appellant in LPA No. 104 of 2020 stands rejected on the score
that LPA is not maintainable against the order of the learned
Heard learned counsel for the appellants in first
LPA No. 104 of 2020. LPA is not maintainable by the appellant
Mr. Rabindra Prasad ... circumstances, the
appellant in LPA No. 104 of 2020 stands rejected on the score
that LPA is not maintainable against the order of the learned
Heard learned counsel for the appellants in first
LPA No. 104 of 2020. LPA is not maintainable by the appellant
Mr. Rabindra Prasad ... circumstances, the
appellant in LPA No. 104 of 2020 stands rejected on the score
that LPA is not maintainable against the order of the learned
appeal. The court held that in a
Page 19 of 102
C/LPA/814/2018 JUDGMENT
letters patent appeal that arises from an appeal disposed ... matter
would be totally different and a cross objection would be
maintainable but in a matter relating to a writ appeal, no cross
objection
2003, a dispute was raised under the
Page 3 of 49
C/LPA/797/2013 JUDGMENT
Industrial Disputes Act (hereinafter referred ... adjudication by this
tribunal is maintainable and the second party union
Page 4 of 49
C/LPA/797/2013 JUDGMENT
have got valid cause
said closure, the petitioners therein filed LPA
No.4 of 2021. The said LPA was dismissed as not maintainable.
12. In view of the above
