soaps imported by the respondent fell in the category of "misbranded cosmetics" falling under Section 10 of the Drugs and Cosmetics ... which laid down to the effect that any misbranded drug or misbranded or spurious cosmetic was prohibited for import into India. Section
State vs
Harvinder ) under Drugs and Cosmetic Act 1940 regarding
manufacture & Sale spurious, adulterated, sub standard
and misbranded drug namely Chaloramphenicol capusles
intended to regulate the import, manufacture, distribution and sale of drugs and cosmetics. Section 3(b) defines 'drug' and for the purpose ... drug or cosmetic with a view to its sale or distribution of any drug or packing of any drug or cosmetic in the ordinary course
goods were found to be misbranded drugs which were prohibited for import under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 . Some other goods were found
Code and Sections 18(C)
and 27(b)(ii) of Drugs and Cosmetic Act.
The allegation against the petitioner
is of running a medical shop ... store without a licence, the seized
drugs were neither found to be misbranded
nor spurious and that, the petitioner has a
clean antecedent
market for human consumption, plants prior to harvesting, drugs and medicinal products, cosmetics, narcotic or psychotropic substances:
Provided that the Central Government may declare ... petitioner's Counsel that for adulteration of food or misbranding, after coming into force of the provisions of FSSA vide notification dated 29th July
Shivkumar Alias Shiwalamal Narumal ... vs State Of Maharashtra on 21 June, 2010
Author: A.B
Kashmir Chand Son Of Mathura Dass And ... vs Central Bureau Of Investigation on 27 April
Gursewak Dass And Others vs State Of Haryana And Another on 26 November, 2010
Author
Shivkumar Alias Shiwalamal Narumal ... vs State Of Maharashtra on 21 June, 2010
Author: A.B
