Trial
Court asserting that he had been deceived into purchasing a
misbranded cosmetic product by M/s Marico Limited, a leading
manufacturer of personal care ... under :
"17C. Misbranded cosmetics.--For the purposes of this
Chapter, a cosmetic shall be deemed to be misbranded,--
xxxx xxxx xxxx
said drug falls under “Misbranded drugs” as per Section 17(b) of the Drugs
and Cosmetics Act, 1940. Hence, the respondent filed the present
complaint ... note that Section 17 of the Drugs and Cosmetics
Act, 1940, deals with “misbranded drugs”. Section 18 of the Act deals with
Page
Dharmendra Kumar Tomar vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 21 April, 2025
Author: Sushrut
Satish Jaiswal vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 21 April, 2025
Author: Sushrut Arvind
Chetan vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 21 April, 2025
Author: Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari
Sanjay Yadav vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 21 April, 2025
Author: Sushrut Arvind
Ashif Iqbal Khan vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 21 April, 2025
Author: Sushrut
Smt. Jyoti Chakrawarty vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 21 April, 2025
Author: Sushrut
Ramlal Jhariya vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 21 April, 2025
Author: Sushrut Arvind
Rajesh vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 21 April, 2025
Author: Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari