Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 3390 (1.50 seconds)

Anand Tiwari vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 10 May, 2013

Rajesh Tiwari, Government Advocate, for Respondents 1, 2 and 3. Shri Naman Nagrath, Senior Advocate, with Shri Himanshu Mishra for respondent No. 4. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Whether approved ... procedure contemplated under Chapter VII has not been followed. 6- Shri Naman Nagrath, learned Senior Advocate appearing for respondent Company, refuted the aforesaid contentions
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 31 - Cited by 5 - Full Document

Department Of Ayurveda And Comunity Ies ... vs Union Of India on 10 July, 2023

MADHYA PRADESH) .....PETITIONERS (BY SHRI KISHORE SHRIVASTAVA - SENIOR ADVOCATE AND SHRI NAMAN NAGRATH - SENIOR ADVOCATE ASSISTED BY SHRI NIKHIL TIWARI, MS. Signature Not Verified Signed ... MADHYA PRADESH) .....PETITIONER (BY SHRI KISHORE SHRIVASTAVA - SENIOR ADVOCATE AND SHRI NAMAN NAGRATH - SENIOR ADVOCATE ASSISTED BY SHRI NIKHIL TIWARI, MS. ADITI SHRIVASTAVA, SHRI ATUL
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 66 - Cited by 2 - V Agarwal - Full Document

Madhya Pradesh Road Development ... vs M/S Jabalpur Corridor (India ) Pvt. Ltd. on 21 December, 2016

Chief justice; and, Hon'ble (Smt) Justice Anjuli Palo. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri Naman Nagrath, Senior Advocate, with Shri S. Pandey and Deepak Joshi for the appellant ... Limited Vs. M/s Jabalpur Corridor (India) Pvt Ltd. 4. Shri Naman Nagrath, learned Senior Counsel took us through various aspects of the matter pertaining
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 43 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Laduram vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 22 April, 2021

Shri Justice Vijay Kumar Shukla, Judge ________________________________________________________ Presence: Shri Naman Nagrath, Senior Advocate with Shri Jubin Prasad, Advocate for the petitioner in WP-22290-2019. Shri ... being answered by this common judgment. 4. We have heard Shri Naman Nagrath, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner in WP No.22290/2019, Shri
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 92 - Cited by 98 - S A Bobde - Full Document

Vinay Nigam vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 22 April, 2021

Justice Vijay Kumar Shukla, Judge ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Presence: Mr. Naman Nagrath, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Anvesh Shrivastava and Mr. Jubin Prasad, Advocates for the petitioners ... Rules of 1960." 6. We have heard Mr. Naman Nagrath, learned Senior Counsel, Mr. Anshuman Singh and Mr. Manoj Kumar Sharma, learned counsel
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 31 - Cited by 18 - S A Bobde - Full Document

Kec International Limited vs M.P. Madhya Kshetra Vidyut Vitaran Co. ... on 25 January, 2016

Rajendra Menon. Hon'ble Shri Justice S. K. Palo. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri Naman Nagrath, learned Sr. counsel with Shri Himanshu Mishra, advocate for the appellant. Shri ... been committed by the trial court which warrants interference. 6. Shri Naman Nagrath, learned Sr. Counsel took us through various terms and conditions
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 3 - S K Palo - Full Document

In Reference (Suo Motu) vs Union Of India on 24 May, 2021

Justice Hon'ble Mr. Justice Atul Sreedharan, Judge ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Presence : Mr. Naman Nagrath, Senior Advocate with Mr. Jubin Prasad, Advocate appeared as Amicus Curiae ... Medical College/District Hospital, Ratlam. Already on this subject-matter, Mr. Naman Nagrath, learned Amicus Curiae has addressed the Court and another Public Interest Litigation
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - M Rafiq - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next