judgment and order dated 27-08-2010, the trial
Court partly decreed the suit and dismissed the counter claim filed by the
respondent. The trial ... claim and the other against the suit of
the appellant being partly decreed. Due to valuation, the appeal against
dismissal of the counter claim
Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, dated 30-12-1978 in partly decreeing the suit and declaring the title of the plaintiffs to the unreclaimed ... learned First Additional Chief Judge after appreciating the entire evidence partly decreed the suit with regard to the extent of unreclaimed portion comprised in Survey
proceed to pass following:
ORDER
The suit of the plaintiff is partly
decreed.
The defendant is liable to pay
Rs.61,300/- to the plaintiff ... 2016
The counter claim of the defendant is
also partly decreed.
The plaintiff is liable to pay
Rs.1,35,450/- to the defendant
Court has dismissed the appeals.
The trial Court in fact had partly decreed the suit.
However, the First Appellate Court reversed the
judgment ... After framing appropriate issues, the trial Court
partly decreed the suit and a preliminary decree of
partition was ordered to be directed to drawn
Written
Statement?
5. What relief and what order?" : Suit stands partly decreed.
REASONS
9. As indicated above, the contest subsists between the plaintiff
Issue No. 10 :No.
Issue No. 11 :No.
Relief :Suit partly decreed as per operative part of the
judgment."
::: Downloaded on - 15/04/2017 ... HCHP
9
8. Accordingly, the suit filed by the plaintiffs was partly
decreed by learned trial Court by passing a decree for permanent
.
injunction
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CHIEF
JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, DHARWAD, PARTLY DECREEING THE
SUIT FILED FOR SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE OF CONTRACT AND
PERMANENT INJUNCTION ... PRINCIPAL
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,
DHARWAD, PARTLY DECREEING THE SUIT FILED FOR SPECIFIC
PERFORMANCE OF CONTRACT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION.
THESE APPEALS COMING
right, title or interest over
it. The suit, was partly decreed; however, the possession was not
granted.
2.2 Shri Sukhlalbhai Vadgama, sold the property ... filed
being Regular Civil Suit no.204 of 1980, which was partly decreed;
however, the possession was not granted to the original owner.
Thereafter
schedule property. The suit O.S.No.162 of 2007 was partly decreed in
favour of the defendant and the I Additional District Court, Tirunelveli ... that the suit O.S.No.162 of 2007 was only partly
decreed in favour of the defendant as the Court had granted in favour
schedule property. The suit O.S.No.162 of 2007 was partly decreed in
favour of the defendant and the I Additional District Court, Tirunelveli ... that the suit O.S.No.162 of 2007 was only partly
decreed in favour of the defendant as the Court had granted in favour
