judis
Crl.R.C.No.1069 of 2016
basing on the radiological examination and it cannot be taken as her true
age; the other accused ... birth
certificate is not available. Hence, she was subjected to radiological
examination for the purpose of assessing her age. The doctor who
conducted radiological examination
statement of PW-1 that
injuries were referred for radiological examination, but in fact, no
radiological examination was done and at least there ... medical evidence
on the file to show that there was any radiological examination of injured
Veerwati or Ram Singh even. There is no opinion
date of occurrence.
11. After considering the physical, dental and radiological
examination, the age of the accused was opined between 25-30 years ... counsel
contended that the margin of error in age ascertained by radiological
examination is two years on either side and the benefit of such margin
Guna @ Gunasekaran vs State By Inspector Of Police (L&O) on 4 July, 2019
matter of determination of age on the basis of radiological examination the margin of error as ascertained from such examination is two years on either ... expected of a normal person. On the point of radiological examination the decision reported in 1989, Calcutta Criminal Law Reporter in 143 has been referred
Professor, Forensic Medicine, A.U. College, Visakhapatnam. On physical, dental and radiological examination of P.W.1, P.W.9 determined ... taken that the margin of error in age ascertained by radiological examination was two years on either side.
17. There cannot be any dispute that
letter of Reference (Exh.26), as well as her
radiological examination was conducted for confirmation of her
age and while recording her history ... also stated that the victim was then sent for
radiological examination to confirm her age. Accordingly, X-ray
of wrist joint, elbow joint
cases where the age has been determined by way of
radiological examination, because of the possibility of
margin of error, two years should be added ... error when the age of a
person is determined by radiological examination.
Therefore, such margin has to be kept in mind.
In the present case
State vs . (I) Tejinder Singh @ Lucky Singh on 5 January, 2013
IN THE COURT OF
purposes of ossification / age
determination test and their physical examination, dental examination
and radiological examination were conducted on 18.05.2012.
According to the witness, vide ... purposes of ossification / age determination test and their
physical examination, dental examination and radiological
examination were conducted on 18.05.2012. According to him, vide
his report
