part of the
respondents/AP Transco in not issuing reposting orders to the
petitioner in spite of his joining A.P. Transco ... neither issued
any posting orders nor any other order affecting the service of
the petitioner including orders dated 12.05.2008.
b) During re-organization of APSEB
having bias against
the applicant did not issue the reposting order. His
representations were not considered by respondent No. 5.
The respondent ... order
dated 09.07.2021 till alternative posting order dated
22.08.2022. The Hon'ble High Court did not issue any
direction to matter related to order
Subsequently, the
respondents, vide order, dated 16.07.1999, had kept the transfer order in
abeyance, then on 16.09.1999 the transfer order was cancelled. Thereafter until ... order, vide order,
dated 16.09.1999. As stated supra, the respondents have made the petitioner under
compulsory waiting period and has passed an order reposting
Subsequently, the
respondents, vide order, dated 16.07.1999 the transfer order was kept in
abeyance, Subsequently, on 16.09.1999 the transfer order was cancelled. After
these years ... have not
issued any reposting order immediately on 16.09.1999 itself. When the earlier
transfer order was cancelled, consequential order ought to have been passed
David Sundar Singh
for RR1 to 5
ORDER
The orders of transfer and posting and reposting are under challenge in
the present writ petition ... revoked the order of
suspension on 03.12.2022 and the petitioner was asked to await posting orders.
Accordingly, the 1st respondent issued an order
David Sundar Singh
for RR1 to 5
ORDER
The orders of transfer and posting and reposting are under challenge in
the present writ petition ... revoked the order of
suspension on 03.12.2022 and the petitioner was asked to await posting orders.
Accordingly, the 1st respondent issued an order
from
service on the ground of unauthorised absence without
considering the earlier orders passed by this Court as illegal,
arbitrary, abuse of process ... duty for nearly three months.
d) The respondents instead of issuing reposting orders,
issued a charge sheet dated 19.11.2003. On receipt of the
said charge
join duty within 15 days from the
date of receipt of reposting orders from the
Unit/Circle offices to which he was posted,
failing which
Section No.II with headquarters at
Hinjilicut, vide Officer Order dated 23.12.1986. On being so
reposted twice, which was contrary to the Office Order dated ... said Office Order, the
Petitioner was reposted at various places. Being aggrieved by
such reposting orders issued by various authorities as
detailed above, the Petitioner
expiry of leave. Authority competent to grant leave
can also issue orders of reposting to the same post
if during the currency of leave ... orders of the appointing authority, the latter
authority can only issue reposting orders of the
officer returning from leave. In such cases the
appointing authority
