transaction, the defendants no.1 & 2
also agreed to enter into Retainership Agreements with the
plaintiff no.1 Company whereunder the defendants ... terms and
conditions of his agreements and after the termination of the
Retainership Agreement w.e.f. 1st July, 2013, stood relieved
from
Trehan, who was
the Executive Director with defendant No.1-company on retainership
basis by letter dated 16th July, 1999 on a retainer ... 28th March, 2007, defendant No.1 was again to
extend the retainership of the plaintiff from 1st April,
2007 to 31st March, 2008. Besides increasing
appointment had been made for a
period of 3 (three) years on retainership fees of Rs.250/- and,
apart from retainership fees ... dispute that by various Circulars,
issued from time to time, the retainership fee as well as daily fees
for appearance of a Government Pleader
approval to be granted for continuing the engagement of instrument technician on retainership basis for maintenane of accuload system for a period of one year ... seeking the consent of the petitioner for acceptance of the retainership and also Ex.W7 dated 25.11.99, marked on 6.10.2005, are all jointly showing
Company. The Company appointed the petitioner as Visiting Medical Officer on monthly retainership basis in the year 1986 initially for a period of 12 months ... Rules, the Company appointed a temporary Visiting Medical Officer on retainership. The petitioner, though appointed as Visiting Medical officer, is a workman as defined under
Rules, the Company appointed a temporary Visiting Medical Officer on retainership. The petitioner, though appointed as Visiting Medical Officer, is a workman as defined under ... services of the petitioner to appoint another Visiting Medical Officer on retainership. Reliance is placed on the following decisions.
1. T.I. Cycles Of India
matter of fact, the appellant herein was a party to a
retainership agreement. In order to avail the services of the appellant
herein ... appellant as an associate against monthly fees. The acceptance of
the retainership by the appellant herein against monthly fees could not
be treated
grievance is against the alleged action of the respondents in
not releasing retainership fees due and admissible to her, in
terms of her appointment ... following prayers:-
.
(i) the respondents may kindly be directed
to release the retainership fee along with
interest @ 18% due to the petitioner for 5
years
Defendant and investment made thereupon. The
payment in lieu of retainership to the tune of Rs.1,65,000/- along
with service tax were made ... Plaintiff for the same. Further the Defendant has stated
that, the retainership arrangement is not condusive to the
Defendant. And thereby, altering the terms
petitioner (respondent before the Ld. Arbitrator) was
liable to pay fixed retainership of Rs. 65,00,000/- for the period
16.05.2008 to August ... perform its obligations and merely
mentioning of the word "retainership" does not mean that it
is/was entitled to retainership amount, irrespective
