desire of the Respondent Company that the Appellant should extend
the retainership with the Company. The learned Counsel submits that the
disputes raised ... rather the other
disputes the Respondent Company wanted to raise regarding retainership.
3. The learned Counsel for the Appellant has relied on the Judgement
month of March
2014 for utilizing services of plaintiff on creative Retainership
basis and plaintiff was appointed as Creative Retainer by
defendant ... business with
the defendants. Defendants admitted that plaintiff sent a proposal
of retainership at monthly charge of Rs.80,000/- per month but
the same
been duly credited to the
Petitioner's account, however, the monthly retainership amount which was
agreed to at the time of his engagement ... GNCTD submits that
the fact that the lawyers are paid a monthly retainership is not disputed,
however, he has not received any instructions
Service Contract dated 9th March, 2019, appointed the respondent /
defendant, "on retainership basis", as a "Visiting Consultant - Obstetrics &
Gynaecology ... Contract Act ); (vi) the appellant / plaintiff had not paid the agreed
minimum retainership fee of Rs.2,25,000/- per month to the respondent /
defendant
taken note of
several grievances regarding the non-payment of
professional fee/retainership fee bills of
empanelled lawyers of the GNCTD and directed
the GNCTD ... bills of the Petitioner are
stated to have now been cleared, his retainership
fee is still not being paid. Since there is no dispute
Firm
even after repeated requests.
The respondent is in wrongful possession of
retainership agreement of both Delhi Corporate
Firm and Mumbai Corporate Firm.
Ousting
employment will come to an end automatic end on expiry of your
retainership period as stipulated above, no notice will be necessary, no
compensation shall ... petitioner and, therefore,
he was paid some amount towards 'Retainership', which cannot be
said to be 'salary' though
employment will come to an end automatic end on expiry of your
retainership period as stipulated above, no notice will be necessary, no
compensation shall ... petitioner and, therefore,
he was paid some amount towards 'Retainership', which cannot be
said to be 'salary' though
security. There is no document to establish
a lawyer-client relationship, no retainership agreement had been filed and
therefore, the claim of the petitioner/plaintiff
Advocate in a reputed
law firm on its rolls or on exclusive retainership basis
(reputed law firm implies a law firm having 10 years
standing ... sought in detailed advertisement]:
a. Nature of Employment - Full Time / Exclusive Retainership
[in case worked in Law Firm] / any other (specify, if any
other
