Petitioner was in violation of rule
6(2) and rule 8(6) of the SARFAESI Rules. It was
however clarified that Respondent ... that Rules 6(2) and 8(6) of the SARFAESI Rules were not complied
with, Mr Dhakephalkar submitted that the DRAT had completely
sale was in violation of Rules 8 and 9(1) and the said contention was accepted by DRAT by giving reasons. When ... DRAT was not correct in dismissing the appeal in spite of its finding that the sale was conducted in utter violation of the statutory rules
notice as required under Rule
8(1) of Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002, (for short,
"Enforcement Rules"). On 20 June ... September 2014, DRAT allowed the
Appeal filed by IFCI against DRT order. On 30 September 2014, as
mandated by Rule 8
notice as required under Rule
8(1) of Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002, (for short,
"Enforcement Rules"). On 20 June ... September 2014, DRAT allowed the
Appeal filed by IFCI against DRT order. On 30 September 2014, as
mandated by Rule 8
notice as required under Rule
8(1) of Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002, (for short,
"Enforcement Rules"). On 20 June ... September 2014, DRAT allowed the
Appeal filed by IFCI against DRT order. On 30 September 2014, as
mandated by Rule 8
notice as required under Rule
8(1) of Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002, (for short,
"Enforcement Rules"). On 20 June ... September 2014, DRAT allowed the
Appeal filed by IFCI against DRT order. On 30 September 2014, as
mandated by Rule 8
notice as required under Rule
8(1) of Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002, (for short,
"Enforcement Rules"). On 20 June ... September 2014, DRAT allowed the
Appeal filed by IFCI against DRT order. On 30 September 2014, as
mandated by Rule 8
notice as required under Rule
8(1) of Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002, (for short,
"Enforcement Rules"). On 20 June ... September 2014, DRAT allowed the
Appeal filed by IFCI against DRT order. On 30 September 2014, as
mandated by Rule 8
notice as required under Rule
8(1) of Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002, (for short,
"Enforcement Rules"). On 20 June ... September 2014, DRAT allowed the
Appeal filed by IFCI against DRT order. On 30 September 2014, as
mandated by Rule 8
notice as required under Rule
8(1) of Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002, (for short,
"Enforcement Rules"). On 20 June ... September 2014, DRAT allowed the
Appeal filed by IFCI against DRT order. On 30 September 2014, as
mandated by Rule 8
