accused Vicky was
conducted and his arrest memo was also prepared. Section
394 / 397 / 34 IPC were also added in the case.
4. During investigation ... Board. Statement of witnesses u/s 161
CrPC were recorded. After completion of investigation charge
sheet u/s 302 / 394 / 397 / 34 IPC was filed
charge with regard to offences
punishable U/s 394/34 IPC & Section 397 IPC. As already noted above,
PW2 Suresh Kumar is the star ... guilt of accused in
respect of offence punishable U/s 397 read with Section 394 IPC.
Accordingly, accused namely Sheikh Firoz @ Dhingra stands convicted
1093/14
Police Station : S.P. Badli
Under Sections : 392/394/397/411 IPC
Date of committal to Sessions Court : 09.02.2015
Date on which judgment ... establishing its case in respect of offence
punishable U/s 397 read with Section 394 IPC. Accordingly, accused namely
Chandan Kumar S/o Sh. Puran
0240IR0039372012
FIR No. 447/11
PS : Hari Nagar
Under Sections : 394/397/34 IPC
State
Versus
Arun, S/o Shri somvir
R/o Jhuggi ... deadly weapon and thus, the accused committed
the offences punishable under Section 394 / 397 / 34 of the IPC, to which
charge of allegations, the accused
Basant Gaon,
Vasant Vihar, New Delhi.
Police Station Vasant Vihar
Under Section 394 / 397 / 34 IPC and 411 IPC
JUDGEMENT
1.Briefly facts ... trial as it pertains to the heinous crime committed under
section 394 / 397 / 34 , 411 IPC which is exclusively triable by court of
Sessions
under Section 394 / 397 / 411 / 34
IPC.
Accused Amir @ Bhura and Mohd. Shakir-
under Section 411 IPC.
Accused Firoz- under Section 394 / 174A IPC.
Accused ... framed the charge under Section
394 / 34 IPC against the accused Istikhar, Firoz and Juned.
The charge under Section 397 / 34 IPC was framed
only
convicted
for the offence u/s 411 IPC.
Accused Bishmilla @ Dillu is
acquitted for the offence u/s
394 / 397 / 34 IPC.
JUDGMENT
BRIEF FACTS ... charges under Section
394 / 34 IPC were framed against both accused and a separate charge under
Section 397 / 411 IPC was framed against accused Neeru
Initially the FIR was registered u/s 392 / 394 / 34 IPC but later
on chargesheet u/s 392 / 397 / 411 / 34 IPC before ... acquitted.
17. In order to prove the offense U/s Sec.394 / 397 / 411 / 34 IPC
against accused, the prosecution was required to prove beyond
2020
FIR No.: 513/2019
Police Station: Anand Vihar
U/s 394/397/411 IPC
State Versus
Ashok Ahirwar
S/o Shri Harlal ... completion of investigation, challan u/s 173
Cr.P.C. was filed by IO on 16.01.2020 u/s 394 / 397 / 411 IPC. The
Court took
Section 27 Arms
FIR No. 161/2020 State Vs. Rahim @ Naim @ Langra and Anr.
PS Kashmere Gate, U/s. 392/394/397 ... 394 / 397 / 34 IPC and Section 27 Arms
Act was framed against the accused Rahim @ Naim @
Langra and charge u/s. 392/394
