Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 72 (0.89 seconds)

Emperor vs Sanjiv Ratnappa on 30 March, 1932

forgery inasmuch as the element of fraud as defined in the Indian Penal Code is absent. Very recently the case of Emperor v. Kashinath Ramchandra ... result in his conviction, this would, therefore, render the alteration of the document fraudulent within the meaning of the Indian Penal Code , In these circumstances
Bombay High Court Cites 40 - Cited by 3 - Full Document

Emperor vs Manant K. Mehta on 30 July, 1925

Sections 408 and 477 A of the Indian Penal Code, and within my cognizance. 2. The Magistrate convicted him under as. 408 and 477A ... four offences. 3. On appeal the Additional Sessions Judge reversed the conviction and sentence for the offence of criminal breach of trust in respect
Bombay High Court Cites 23 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next