Khare and Mr. Narendra Sharma for the petitioners and Mr. V.K. Tankha, learned Advocate General for the State alongwith Mr. Hemant Shrivastava ... decision rendered in the case of Balaji (supra).
13. Mr. V.K. Tankha, learned Advocate General, sounding a contra note, submitted that when the population
petitioner.
6. So far as this policy is concerned, Shri V. K. Tankha, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the Chhattisgarh Udyog Mahasangh ... under Chhattisgarh Bhandar Kraya Adhiniyam 2002 are applicable or not. Shri Vivek Tankha, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that these rules have
land allotted in its
favour measures 8000 sq. feet.
Mr. Vivek K. Tankha, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of
the Respondent in Civil Appeal ... permission of the State therefor was mandatorily required to be obtained..
Mr. Tankha further drew our attention to the events which took place
subsequent
cases as well as by the learned Advocate General, Mr. V.K. Tankha that the pleadings in these cases are complete in all respects
which abolishes a body discharging the function of judiciary.
41. Shri Vivek Tankha, learned Advocate General appearing for the respondent/State of Madhya Pradesh ... constituted the same. In our opinion, the above contention of Shri Vivek Tankha has considerable force.
42. Shri S.L. Saxena, learned Senior Advocate appearing
been brought on record.
6. We have heard Mr. V.K. Tankha, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Rajendra Menon, learned counsel ... Assailing the defensibility of the promotion policy it is contended by Mr. Tankha that the policy offends the conscience of Articles
2010
UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ..... Appellants
Through: Mr. Vivek K. Tankha, ASG with
Mr. Arjun Harkauli, Mr. Sumeer
Sodhi, Advs.
Versus
EDWARD KEVENTER ..... Respondent ... processed by the department in
accordance with law.
9. Mr. Vivek K. Tankha, learned Additional Solicitor General,
challenging the legal tenability of the order passed
Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India.
5. Mr. Vivck Tankha appears on behalf of the petitioner. Respondent ... respondent No. 3 is represented by Shri Ravindra Shrivas-tava.
6. Mr. Tankha, appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the petitioner Company
North Block,
New Delhi 110 001. Respondents
(By Advocates : Mr. Vivek K. Tankha, ASG with Mrs. Jyoti Singh,
Shri Sumeer Sodhi and Mr. Amandeep Joshi ... Respondents have entered appearance and filed their counter reply. Shri Vivek K. Tankha, learned Additional Solicitor General of India along with Mrs. Jyoti Singh, Shri
judicial review under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
Mr. Vivek Tankha, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the
Writ Petitioner-Respondents ... year, it was urged that such deviation was
permissible in law.
Mr. Tankha would submit that in regard to the violation of condition
