Khare and Mr. Narendra Sharma for the petitioners and Mr. V.K. Tankha, learned Advocate General for the State alongwith Mr. Hemant Shrivastava ... decision rendered in the case of Balaji (supra).
13. Mr. V.K. Tankha, learned Advocate General, sounding a contra note, submitted that when the population
interest is concerned.
8. Assailants the aforesaid award Mr. V.K. Tankha, learned counsel for the appellant, has contended that the arbitrator was not justified ... arbitration agreement between the parties. It is also submitted by Mr. Tankha that the Steel Authority of India Limited unilteraly diverted the scrap from
cases as well as by the learned Advocate General, Mr. V.K. Tankha that the pleadings in these cases are complete in all respects
Kochar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. V.K. Tankha, learned Advocate General appearing for the respondents ... Tankha, learned Advocate General for the State, combating the aforesaid submissions has contended that registration of an FIR in all circumstances is not a must
clearly exposes the inherent illegality in conducting of the meeting.
8. Mr. Tankha, learned counsel for the respondents Nos. 3 and 4, resisting the aforesaid ... make the proceedings non-est in law. In any case, submits Mr. Tankha, that when the members have participated and voted after certain
been brought on record.
6. We have heard Mr. V.K. Tankha, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Rajendra Menon, learned counsel ... Assailing the defensibility of the promotion policy it is contended by Mr. Tankha that the policy offends the conscience of Articles
Nikhra, Learned Counsel for the respondent No. 1 and Mr. V.K. Tankha, learned senior counsel along with Mr. Naman Nagrath ... proceeded in accordance with law.
10. Mr. V.K. Tankha, learned senior counsel for the respondent No. 2 contended that the petitioner has no locus
counsel with Mr. Akshay Dharmadhikari for the petitioner and Mr. V.K.Tankha, learned senior counsel with Mr. H.K.Upadhyaya for the respondent ... advert to the relevant entries and their purposes Mr. V.K.Tankha has raised a preliminary objection that the decision rendered in the case
2010
UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ..... Appellants
Through: Mr. Vivek K. Tankha, ASG with
Mr. Arjun Harkauli, Mr. Sumeer
Sodhi, Advs.
Versus
EDWARD KEVENTER ..... Respondent ... processed by the department in
accordance with law.
9. Mr. Vivek K. Tankha, learned Additional Solicitor General,
challenging the legal tenability of the order passed
Subramonium Prasad, learned
senior counsel for the appellant and Mr. Vivek Tankha,
learned senior counsel for the first respondent.
6. It is submitted ... taking place.
7. Resisting the aforesaid submissions it is canvassed by
Mr. Tankha, learned senior counsel for the first respondent
9
that when the High
