Rohan Sunil Abbott vs The State Of Maharashtra on 15 November, 2021
Author: Sandeep K. Shinde
Bench: Sandeep K. Shinde
Digitally
signed by
SHAMBHAVI
SHAMBHAVI ... 3031 OF 2021
WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.2218 OF 2021
Rohan Sunil Abbott ... Petitioner
Vs
The State of Maharashtra ... Respondents
...
Mr. Aniesh S. Jadhav with
Maharaja of Burdwan. He complains of an order passed by Mr. Abbott, Assistant Commissioner, with powers of a magistrate, at Darjeeling, under Section ... Commissioner, instituted proceedings and referred them for hearing and trial to Mr. Abbott; and Mr. Abbott passed the order which is now complained
Stark 111. This case was tried in the year 1817 before Abbott, J., and a jury. What happened was this : After the case had been ... Bench, that it was not altogether impossible in the opinion of Abbott, J. that some mistake or misapprehension might have taken place and that some
Abasaheb Yadav Honmane And Ashwini ... vs The State Of Maharashtra on 12 March, 2008
Equivalent
Parliament shall not
be evaded by shift or contrivance" (per Abbott C.J. in Fox
v. Bishop of Chester(1) "To carry
Parliament shall not be evaded by shift or contrivance" (per Abbott C.J. in Fox v. Bishop of Chester
exercise
definite Municipal do. This distinction was made in Abbott's
Corporations, Vol. 11, p. 1456 etc., and is to be found
reflected also
maxim has been repeatedly denounced by the Judges of the English Courts. Abbott, C.J., observed in Montriou v. Jafferys ... very different scope and application.
I respectfully adopt the observations of Abbott C.J., Scrutton, L.. J. and Lord Atkin referred to supra
G. Narayanaswami Naidu And Ors. vs Inspector Of Police And Anr. on 30 July, 1948
erroneous and infact the Phensedyl
cough syrup is made by M/s Abbott Health Care
Pvt. Ltd. under license, as permissible limit of
codiene
