Court, as such, the direction of
the Trial Court to pay ad valorem Court fees on the amount
of Rs.20 lakhs was not sustainable ... Civil) 54.
5 Civil Appeal No.3987 of 2006
9
that ad valorem court fees would be payable in a suit for
malicious prosecution
ground that the plaintiff-petitioner had failed to
affix the ad valorem court fee on the market value of the suit property ... suit property in favour of the
defendant-respondents, hence, ad valorem court fee was not payable. Per
contra, learned counsel for the defendant-respondent
been held that the plaintiff-petitioner is
bound to pay ad-valorem court fee and the plaintiff-petitioner has been
granted one opportunity to make ... ground that the plaintiff-petitioner had failed to affix the ad valorem
court fee on the total sale consideration and that the plaint was liable
under Section 52 of the Act. That is to say on ad
valorem.
2. The submission of the learned counsel appearing
for the appellant ... alone, payment of court fees ad valorem is not required. In that
regard, the learned counsel placed reliance on Beena K.G. v.
Keshavam
liable to be rejected on the ground of non-payment of
ad valorem court fees. It is contended that plaintiff No.1 migrated to
Norway ... suit properties.
Thus, the plaintiffs are required to pay ad valorem court fees on the
share claimed by them in the suit properties
valuation is of Rs.46 Lakhs @ 12%,
plaintiff has to pay ad valorem court fees of Rs.5,52,000/- but plaintiff has paid
only ... allowing application
of respondents/defendants directed the petitioner/plaintiff to pay ad-valorem
3
court fees as per the sale consideration of sale-deed. Aggrieved
Jabalpur (MP) whereby the
petitioner / plaintiff has been directed to pay ad valorem court fees of
Rs.5,22,132/- @ 12% on suit valuation ... present case and the petitioner is
required to pay ad valorem court fees i.e. Rs.5,22,132/- @ 12% on valuation of
the suit
Senior
Division), Kurukshetra, whereby the petitioner/plaintiff was directed to pay
ad-valorem court fee in a suit for declaration and consequential relief of
permanent ... that the trial Court
erred in directing the petitioner to affix ad-valorem Court fee with the plaint
as the same would have been payable
valued. Having sought the
relief of possession, court fee was payable advalorem on the
market value of the property as the plaintiff ... position of the suit property. Thus, court fee
payable is not advalorem, rather fixed court fee of Rs.130/ was
payable. It was also
Judge (Junior
Division), whereby the petitioner has been directed to pay ad valorem Court
fee, within a period of two months from the date ... thereby making a prayer to direct the plaintiff to affix ad valorem
court fee on the claimed amount and on his failure, the plaint
