Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 2480 (1.74 seconds)

Mrf Ltd. vs Cce on 5 January, 1996

duty should not be demanded at the rate of 40% ad valorem on their past clearances Under Section 11A of the Central Excises & Salt ... above which is reproduced below: 1. 1.3.1986 Paid duty @ 15% ad valorem to 4006.90. 31.10.1986 2. 28.10.1986 Asstt. Collector visited the Factory and issued instructions
Customs, Excise and Gold Tribunal - Tamil Nadu Cites 13 - Cited by 26 - Full Document

Collector Of C. Ex vs Metrowood Engineering Works on 16 February, 1989

Industrial Laminates (Electrical Insulators) under Heading 8546.00 chargeable to duty @ 15% ad valorem. The Assistant Collector of Central Excise classified the Industrial Laminates (Electrical Insulators ... under Heading 3920.31 chargeable to duty @ 35% ad valorem and approved the aforesaid classification list after making modification to the above effect. The respondents challenged
Customs, Excise and Gold Tribunal - Delhi Cites 7 - Cited by 2 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next