Meghana Ashok vs Ambati Nihar Rakshak on 3 January, 2024
Bench: Hrishikesh Roy , Prashant Kumar Mishra
1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL ORIGINAL ... PETITION (CIVIL) Diary No(s). 16869/2023
MEGHANA ASHOK Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
AMBATI NIHAR RAKSHAK Respondent(s)
O R D E R
Delay condoned
Ambati Vijaya vs The State Of Telangana on 27 February, 2024
Bench: Vikram Nath , Prashant Kumar Mishra
ITEM NO.20 COURT NO.8 SECTION ... passed by the High Court For The State Of
Telangana At Hyderabad)
AMBATI VIJAYA Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
THE STATE OF TELANGANA & ORS. Respondent
Anil Kumar Telugu Kukkala vs Ambati Sukrutha on 7 March, 2025
Bench: J.K. Maheshwari , Prashant Kumar Mishra
ITEM NO.23 COURT NO.6 SECTION ... State of
Telangana at Hyderabad]
ANIL KUMAR TELUGU KUKKALA PETITIONER(S)
VERSUS
AMBATI SUKRUTHA RESPONDENT(S)
FOR ADMISSION and I.R.
Date
Meghana Ashok vs Ambati Nihar Rakshak on 11 September, 2023
Author: Prashant Kumar Mishra
Bench: Prashant Kumar Mishra
ITEM NO.1720 COURT NO.16 SECTION ... PETITION
(CIVIL) Diary No(s). 16869/2023
MEGHANA ASHOK Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
AMBATI NIHAR RAKSHAK Respondent(s)
IA No. 149446/2023 - CONDONATION OF DELAY
Ambati Harini Reddy vs Devarla Krishna Chaitanya on 13 July, 2023
Bench: B.V. Nagarathna , Prashant Kumar Mishra
ITEM NO.7 COURT NO.15 SECTION ... RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
TRANSFER PETITION(S)(CIVIL) NO(S). 793/2023
AMBATI HARINI REDDY Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
DEVARLA KRISHNA CHAITANYA Respondent(s)
(IA No. 63498
made herein and upon hearing the
arguments of Sri.'Sudhakar Rao Ambati Advocate for the petitioners, SriN.Harinath,
learned Assistant Solicitor General for Respondent
conformity with this mandatory
requirement would be illegal and without jurisdiction.
(See Ambati Narasayya v. M. Subba Rao [1989 Supp (2)
SCC 693].) The duty ... Bandhu Gupta v. N.L.
Anand [(1994) 1 SCC 131].”
24. In Ambati Narasayya vs. M. Subba Rao12 this Court
has held that in auction
Kiran Kumar
5. Mr. Karumanchi Indraneel Babu
6. Mr. Sudhakar Rao Ambati
7. Mr. Ponnekanti Mallikarjuna Rao
8. Mr. G.V.R.Chowdary
made herein and upon hearing the arguments of
Sri.Sudhakar Rao Ambati Advocate for the petitioners, SriN.Harinath, learned Assistant
Solicitor General for Respondent
Additional Advocate General for the Appellants and Sri Ambati
Sudhakar Rao, learned counsel for the respondents.
3. Erragunta and Karakambadi villages of Renigunta
Mandal
