perusal of Ex.A1 document, dated 13.06.1927 which is
executed by one Mayandi Nadar in favour of Perumal Nadar, the
description of the property ... would reveal the suit property and adjacent
properties. It is very ancient document that is in the year of 1927.
Therefore, on the northern side
plaintiff in respect of the suit property, which is an ancient document and
ought to have decreed the suit for injunction. The trial Court erred
seen from the said documents that defendants
documents are latest documents and the plaintiff documents are
oldest. Therefore, this Court hold that the plaintiff ... duty of the first defendant to produce the ancient document of his
vendor prior to 1973. But, the first defendant has failed
plaintiff in respect of the suit property, which is an ancient document and
ought to have decreed the suit for injunction. The trial Court erred
petitioner
presented two documents for registration. The Registrar has refused to
register the documents stating that the original parent document was not
produced ... documents are of the year 1960 and 1966 and they are ancient
documents. It is not necessary in every case to produce the original
parent
Court ignoring the title deeds
produced by the plaintiffs which are ancient documents?
4.Whether the Lower Appellate Court was right in not considering ... plaintiffs ought to prove the title deeds, when the said documents are ancient / old
documents. Admittedly the sale was in the year 1958. Further
Court ignoring the title deeds
produced by the plaintiffs which are ancient documents?
4.Whether the Lower Appellate Court was right in not considering ... plaintiffs ought to prove the title deeds, when the said documents are ancient / old
documents. Admittedly the sale was in the year 1958. Further
Indian Evidence
Act lays down that when a document is an ancient document, being 30
years old, presumption arises as to execution, attestation and state
document of thirty years old or what is known as
Ancient Documents.
(l) The ld. trial court failed to appreciate the fact that the appellant ... title documents of the suit property dated 1982 and
which the ancient documents as per the law prevailing under Section
90 of Evidence
when these days AYUSH is perceived as one of the most ancient well documented system of medicine, wherein prominence to prevention of disease is given
