MANU/JH/0703/2010
10
2026:JHHC:13049
1959-2019. Their own application under Section 71A for
recovery of possession, which was dismissed in favour ... present case, the Petitioner was illegally
dispossessed, and is therefore entitled to restoration.
He finally submitted that the Respondents, knowing
that their remedy lay before
MANU/JH/0703/2010
10
2026:JHHC:13049
1959-2019. Their own application under Section 71A for
recovery of possession, which was dismissed in favour ... present case, the Petitioner was illegally
dispossessed, and is therefore entitled to restoration.
He finally submitted that the Respondents, knowing
that their remedy lay before
MANU/JH/0703/2010
10
2026:JHHC:13049
1959-2019. Their own application under Section 71A for
recovery of possession, which was dismissed in favour ... present case, the Petitioner was illegally
dispossessed, and is therefore entitled to restoration.
He finally submitted that the Respondents, knowing
that their remedy lay before
MANU/JH/0703/2010
10
2026:JHHC:13049
1959-2019. Their own application under Section 71A for
recovery of possession, which was dismissed in favour ... present case, the Petitioner was illegally
dispossessed, and is therefore entitled to restoration.
He finally submitted that the Respondents, knowing
that their remedy lay before
MANU/JH/0703/2010
10
2026:JHHC:13049
1959-2019. Their own application under Section 71A for
recovery of possession, which was dismissed in favour ... present case, the Petitioner was illegally
dispossessed, and is therefore entitled to restoration.
He finally submitted that the Respondents, knowing
that their remedy lay before
MANU/JH/0703/2010
10
2026:JHHC:13049
1959-2019. Their own application under Section 71A for
recovery of possession, which was dismissed in favour ... present case, the Petitioner was illegally
dispossessed, and is therefore entitled to restoration.
He finally submitted that the Respondents, knowing
that their remedy lay before
MANU/JH/0703/2010
10
2026:JHHC:13049
1959-2019. Their own application under Section 71A for
recovery of possession, which was dismissed in favour ... present case, the Petitioner was illegally
dispossessed, and is therefore entitled to restoration.
He finally submitted that the Respondents, knowing
that their remedy lay before
MANU/JH/0703/2010
10
2026:JHHC:13049
1959-2019. Their own application under Section 71A for
recovery of possession, which was dismissed in favour ... present case, the Petitioner was illegally
dispossessed, and is therefore entitled to restoration.
He finally submitted that the Respondents, knowing
that their remedy lay before
MANU/JH/0703/2010
10
2026:JHHC:13049
1959-2019. Their own application under Section 71A for
recovery of possession, which was dismissed in favour ... present case, the Petitioner was illegally
dispossessed, and is therefore entitled to restoration.
He finally submitted that the Respondents, knowing
that their remedy lay before
MANU/JH/0703/2010
10
2026:JHHC:13049
1959-2019. Their own application under Section 71A for
recovery of possession, which was dismissed in favour ... present case, the Petitioner was illegally
dispossessed, and is therefore entitled to restoration.
He finally submitted that the Respondents, knowing
that their remedy lay before
