Model Code of Conduct are not
statutory in nature. Therefore, any alleged violation of the code of
conduct qua issuance of the appointment letters, invites ... Model Code of Conduct, by its nomenclature itself; is
clearly indicative of the fact that this is only a code of conduct which is
expected
were offered appointments before 17.12.2004 and 1454 candidates were offered appointments are 17.12.2004 i.e. after imposition of Model Code of Conduct ... appointments in Governments, public undertakings etc. the making of appointments on regular basis was even bigger favour and was against the Model Code of Conduct
Model Code of Conduct which was to be observed during the period of election. Clause 3(d) of the Model Code of Conduct provided that ... under Clause 7(vi)(d) of the Model Code of Conduct for elections, only an ad hoc appointment cannot be made. Appointment on regular basis
were medically examined but before the
appointment letters could be issued, the Model code of conduct
was imposed which came in existence ... imposition of model code of conduct and extinguishing
of waiting list in June, 2012.
It is not understandable if code of conduct came
been denied
appointment after due selection on the ground that he could not be
offered appointment in view of model code of conduct having taken ... court has already viewed that the model code of conduct could
not be pressed into service to deny appointment to an individual.
Reference can here
selection process was completed but appointment letters could not be issued
because of promulgation of the Model Code of Conduct. In those
circumstances ... been selected could not be appointed on account of coming into force of
Election Model Code of Conduct and subsequently the selection was set
aside
Model Code of Conduct was clamped by the Election Commission
of India, New Delhi on 17.12.2004. On the day when the Model Code of
Conduct ... India had indicated that officers responsible for appointment
in violation of Model Code of Conduct would be liable for
disciplinary action of Commission
Method of recruitment and the principles to be
followed in making appointments to the Group C and
Group D posts under the State Government ... selection process was completed but appointment letters could not be issued
because of promulgation of the Model Code of Conduct. In those
circumstances
State Assembly were announced
on 17.12.2004 and the Model Code of Conduct came
into force. Appointments were made in violation of the
Code of Conduct ... Model Code of Conduct could also not be a ground to
justify the termination of services of appellants. The
object of Model Code
Selection Board and
recommended for appointment in the year 2001 itself. However,
before they could be given the appointment, elections were declared
in the State ... event model code of
LPA No. 108 of 2012 (O&M) -2-
conduct was enforced, which mandated not to give any new
appointments till
