interim
measure of protection before or during the arbitral proceeding
or at any time after making of arbitral award but before it is
enforced ... application U/s.9 is filed before commencement
of the arbitral proceeding, there has to be manifest intention
on the part of the applicant
interim
measure of protection before or during the arbitral
proceeding or at any time after making of arbitral
award but before it is enforced ... application U/s.9 is filed before
commencement of the arbitral proceeding, there has to
be manifest intention on the part of the applicant
interim
measure of protection before or during the arbitral
proceeding or at any time after making of arbitral award
but before it is enforced ... application
U/s.9 is filed before commencement of the arbitral
proceeding, there has to be manifest intention on the
part of the applicant
interim measure of protection before or during the
arbitral proceeding or at any time after making of
arbitral award but before it is enforced ... application U/s.9 is filed before
commencement of the arbitral proceeding, there has
to be manifest intention on the part of the applicant
Supreme Court of
India and commencement of Arbitral Proceeding before the
learned Arbitral Tribunal.
67. The Respondent appeared before the Hon'ble Tribunal ... proceeding. The proceeding
contemplated under Section of 34 of Arbitration & Conciliation
Act, 1996 cannot be equated to a proceeding under Order
supra, the scope of
interference by the court in regard to the arbitral award is limited
scope. The scope of interference under ... composition of
arbitral tribunal was not in accordance with the
part I of the Act.
(3) if the arbitral proceeding was not in
accordance with
Smt. Jayamma vs Rohan Housing Pvt. Ltd on 18 February, 2022
1 Com.A.S
supra, the scope of
interference by the court in regard to the arbitral award is limited
scope. The scope of interference under ... arbitral tribunal was not in accordance with the
part I of the Act.
41 Com.A.P.No.27/2020
(3) if the arbitral proceeding
M/S Nitesh Residency Hotels Pvt. Ltd vs The Archdiocease Of Bangalore on 14 July
With the pronouncement and publication of the
Award, this arbitral proceeding stands terminated as per
Section 32(1) of the Act.
55. This Award ... averments made in its
Statement of Objections filed before the Learned Arbitral
Tribunal apart from urging the grounds to set aside the
impugned Award
