much
against the principle of natural justice and also contrary to Article 300A
of the Constitution of India.
12. Mr. Maitra further contended that
interfered with at this belated stage.
Right to property under Article 300A would not only apply to the
borrower but also to the bonafide purchaser
interfered with at this belated stage.
Right to property under Article 300A would not only apply to the
borrower but also to the bonafide purchaser
petitioner's pensionary benefit which is given under the Article 300A of the
Constitution of India as the property. Only the petitioner
private respondent, the petitioner's right to property under Article
300A of the Constitution of India has also been seriously
prejudiced.
16. Your petitioner ... private respondent who has been infringing his right
guaranteed under Article 300A of the Constitution of India.
For the aforesaid reasons, I hold that this
unjust deprivation and deprivation offending the provisions of Articles 14
and 300A of the Constitution of India. An intermediary holding a bare plot of
land
would clearly
violate the rights of the writ petitioners under Article 21
read with 300A of the Constitution of India. We see no
reason