Search Results Page

Search Results

51 - 60 of 860 (0.69 seconds)

Also At vs Z­Lib.Org And Ors on 19 April, 2023

defendant nos. 13 to 22. The said authors had assigned the copyright of the said books in favour of the plaintiff by virtue of written ... plaint (supra) written by defendant nos. 13 to 23 who had assigned their copyright in favour of the plaintiff. Defendant nos. 13 to 23 have
Delhi District Court Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Novex Communications Private Ltd vs M/S City Bar on 8 December, 2017

with their copyrighted songs. The owners of Zee Entertainment Enterprises   Ltd.   had   authorised   the   plaintiff   to   deal   with   its   Copyrighted   songs  vide Assignment Deed ... Copyrights of Zee Enterprises and that these copyrights have been infringed by the defendants on 03.06.2016 by playing the copyrighted songs without requisite license.  RELIEF
Delhi District Court Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Under Armour vs Avengers on 14 December, 2020

their associates and agents, officers, employees, distributors, representatives and assigns from using the trademarks and copyright "UNDER ARMOUR ... their associates and agents, officers, employees, distributors, representatives and assigns from using the trademarks and copyright "UNDER ARMOUR
Delhi District Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Anamika Sood vs Saregama India Pvt. Ltd on 18 April, 2026

MixSingh) and assigned to the Plaintiff vide Assignment Deed dated 04.09.2020, in cross- examination the Plaintiff has denied the existence of such assignment and admitted ... Copyright Act, 1957, which provides that copyright shall not subsist in a sound recording if, in making such recording, copyright in any underlying literary, dramatic
Delhi District Court Cites 24 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Nike Innovate Cv vs Sukhmeet Singh on 25 September, 2023

defendant, its associates and agents, officers, employees, distributors, representatives and assigns from using the copyright vested in device/logo of Swoosh mark ... associates and agents, officers, employees, distributors, representatives and assigns from using any trademark and copyright vested in the trademark Nike and/or device/logo
Delhi District Court Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Levi Strauss And Co vs Tasleem Ahmad on 21 December, 2024

associates and agents, employees, manufacturers, distributors, franchisee, representatives and assigns from using copyright in the artistic work vested in the "Levi's marks ... associates and agents, employees, manufacturers, distributors, franchisee, representatives and assigns from using copyright in the artistic work vested in the "Levi's marks
Delhi District Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
Previous   2 3 4 5 6   7 8 9 10 11 Next