Book at pages 87-90, a portion has been deliberately incorporated and backdated with malafide intention, though the applicant company had never passed such ... company, the following portion has been interpolated or fudged or forged or backdated, which reads as follows :
"The Chairman informed the Board
effect to the appointment of the
respondents 5 to 7 from backdate from 6.11.1987 as though they have been
appointed in the approved vacancy ... giving effect to the appointment
of the respondents 5 to 7 from backdate from 6.11.1987 as though they have been
appointed in the approved
several
factors. After the respondents herein have been
granted regularisation from the backdate, in the
normal course, they are entitled to consequential
benefits from ... rightly come to the conclusion that the grant of
regularisation from the backdate without
ancillary benefits is of no relevance. It is also
several factors. After the respondents herein have been granted regularisation from the backdate, in the normal course, they are entitled to consequential benefits from ... rightly come to the conclusion that the grant of regularisation from the backdate without ancillary benefits is of no relevance. It is also
several factors. After the respondents herein have been granted regularisation from the backdate, in the normal course, they are entitled to consequential benefits from ... rightly come to the conclusion that the grant of regularisation from the backdate without ancillary benefits is of no relevance. It is also
legal proceedings in order to show that the document has been
backdated or altered."
24.(a) The authoritative methodologies recommended in the authorities
legal proceedings in order to show that the document has been backdated or altered."
23.(a) The authoritative methodologies recommended in the authorities
cannot be deemed to have come into force from a backdate.
21. In this regard, it is appropriate to refer the decision
Constitution.
(iii) Ordinarily, notional seniority may not be granted from the backdate and if it is done, it must be based on objective considerations
Jayaraman in Hong Kong to send a letter directly to LW backdating it as
27.03.1997. However, the appellate authorities did not accept the same
