Prof. M. Wajid Khan vs Aligarh Muslim University Through Its ... on 4 April, 1997
over, University had wrongly and mala fide issued promotion orders to the appellants by way of backdating them on 12-3-1986. The merit promotion
Search Results Page
Search Results
31 - 40 of 369 (0.27 seconds)Amit Kunar Chattopadhyay vs Union Of India Through The Secretary on 25 August, 2011
case of Balwant Singh Narwal (supra) they are entitled to promotion and seniority from back date.
16. Similarly, applicants cannot also take any assistance from ... there are valid reasons for granting the promotion and seniority to the applicants from backdate, as already noticed above.
17. The matter can also
Shri Ajay Vibhanshu vs Union Of India And Ors on 18 October, 2024
declared "unfit" for
promotion by the DPC.
5. The appellant was once again considered for promotion to the rank
of Deputy Commandant ... 2024 Page No. 2 of 8
requesting that his promotion and seniority be backdated to the DPC of the
year 2003 for the vacancy year
Ramesh Chandra vs The State Of Bihar And Ors. on 21 January, 2002
turn promotion under Rule 660-C of the Bihar Police Manual is a substantive promotion, on merit, like promotion under Rule 649. Such promotion having ... promotion with effect from 5-7-1996 vide order dated 5-1-2001 by which the out of turn promotion was granted from a backdate
Unknown vs Union Of India And Others on 9 September, 2025
application') filed by the
petitioner seeking her promotion from the backdate has
been rejected.
2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and
perused ... Song and Drama Division as on
01.01.2002. The petitioner became entitled for promotion to
the next higher post of Assistant Director on completion of
three
Mr N C Sinha vs Union Of India on 9 September, 2024
whether the petitioner shall be entitled to
notional promotion from a backdate including the consequential
benefits. This, according to Mr. Nandakumar, is because ... petitioner is entitled to notional promotion to
the post of Additional Member, Railway Board, from a backdate
in fresh proceedings before the Central Administrative Tribunal
Mr N C Sinha vs Union Of India on 9 September, 2024
whether the petitioner shall be entitled to
notional promotion from a backdate including the consequential
benefits. This, according to Mr. Nandakumar, is because ... petitioner is entitled to notional promotion to
the post of Additional Member, Railway Board, from a backdate
in fresh proceedings before the Central Administrative Tribunal
Mr N C Sinha vs Union Of India on 9 September, 2024
whether the petitioner shall be entitled to
notional promotion from a backdate including the consequential
benefits. This, according to Mr. Nandakumar, is because ... petitioner is entitled to notional promotion to
the post of Additional Member, Railway Board, from a backdate
in fresh proceedings before the Central Administrative Tribunal
M vs Union on 18 March, 2009
Stores Grade-I. The petitioner's request to treat his
promotion retrospective from the year 1999 came to be rejected.
Feeling
aggrieved, the petitioner ... earlier. Hence, the
petitioner's promotion as Supervisor Barrack and Stores Grade-I
requires to be backdated to 1999.
We
are unable to agree
Union Of India vs Mammathu on 12 June, 2024
Tribunal and
objected to the claim and submitted that the appointment by
promotion itself was after the new Rules had come into effect
and therefore ... came into force with effect from
1.1.2004, any promotion effected thereafter, cannot be
backdated and therefore, according to him, the point is not
covered