Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

Niranjan Roy @ Niranjan Rai vs The State Of Jharkhand Through ... on 27 November, 2019 Equivalent

situation. The further allegation against these petitioners is that they had also backdated the Measurement-Book and shown the Patna High Court Cr.Misc

mentioned persons as they all are instrumental in creating such fabricated and backdated documents only to deprive me and my wife of our legitimate rights

original accused N.3 was knowing this fact, he prepared Banakhat of backdate for the land of Survey No.164 on stamp paper

Bank on 12/6/2018, which shows that it was created backdated and based on the said report, the borrower availed desired credit facilities from

purposely valued at Rs.95 to create an agreement on a backdate. As for valuation, above Rs.100/- property cannot be transferred except

situation. The further allegation against these petitioners is that they had also backdated the Measurement-Book and shown the Patna High Court Cr.Misc

have purchased tractors. Allegation is that the purchase order was prepared by backdating the purchase receipt just to claim excess subsidy and Patna High Court

with his elder brother "prepared and typed a statement upon a backdated non-judicial stamp paper and I was made to sign therein giving ... therein the backdate '24.12.2013' as instructed by both of them..." The substance of the complaint is that the complainant continues as partner

Town, Jabalpur that this petitioner-accused has made some wrong entry in backdate in the receive- dispatch register. So, petitioner-accused be protected under Section