deemed accurate under
the Apprentice Act 1961 (Amendment) 2014?
Q7. Can a backdated Offline contract be generated under the Apprentice Act
1961 (Amendment ... backdated Online contract be generated under the Apprentice Act
1961 (Amendment) 2014?
Q9. Can an Offline contract be generated backdated after completion of
Apprenticeship Training
deemed accurate under
the Apprentice Act 1961 (Amendment) 2014?
Q7. Can a backdated Offline contract be generated under the Apprentice Act
1961 (Amendment ... backdated Online contract be generated under the Apprentice Act
1961 (Amendment) 2014?
Q9. Can an Offline contract be generated backdated after completion of
Apprenticeship Training
deemed accurate under
the Apprentice Act 1961 (Amendment) 2014?
Q7. Can a backdated Offline contract be generated under the Apprentice Act
1961 (Amendment ... backdated Online contract be generated under the Apprentice Act
1961 (Amendment) 2014?
Q9. Can an Offline contract be generated backdated after completion of
Apprenticeship Training
deemed accurate under
the Apprentice Act 1961 (Amendment) 2014?
Q7. Can a backdated Offline contract be generated under the Apprentice Act
1961 (Amendment ... backdated Online contract be generated under the Apprentice Act
1961 (Amendment) 2014?
Q9. Can an Offline contract be generated backdated after completion of
Apprenticeship Training
order dated 22.10.2008. However, he alleged that the orders of AA were backdated
and also mentioned that:
i) In reply to his RTI application dated ... receipt of Order dt. 21.08.2008 of the
Commission and even passed backdated order ?
7. In his written submissions, present CPIO Shri P.M. Jaikar explained
months. He claimed
that the reply provided by the Respondent is backdated reply. Upon queried by the
Commission as to on what basis ... claiming that the reply sent by the
Respondent is a backdated reply, he could not provide a cogent reply.
The Respondent submitted that appropriate reply
This should include reasons for as alleged by the Appellant,
backdating of the responses.
In the Central Information Commission
at
New Delhi
File ... deliberate tactic by the Principal to cover up the delay by backdating the letter.
Decision
2. The Commission after hearing the submissions by both sides
second
appeal alleging that the order of the 1st Appellate Authority was backdated
and, therefore, a fraud on the RTI Act . This is a serious
chairman
for misusing the authority of digital signature for
sanction of the backdated resignations of the
chairman of the bank and few other directors
Respondent has added certain papers into
the case diary that too backdated. Narration of facts is reproduced verbatim
as under:
a. Delhi Police had filed
