Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

ought to have been considered under the BC General category. Though the petitioner was considered under BC (Priority) category, he secured more marks than

Rotation Turn of General Turn General Priority (GTGPR), General Turn General Priority for Physically Handicapped (GTGPH) and BC GL Priority (BCGPR) as per the Notification ... Rotation Turn of General Turn General Priority (GTGPR), General Turn General Priority for Physically Handicapped (GTGPH) and BC GL Priority (BCGPR) as per the Notification

respondent to consider the petitioner's application under the BC, Priority Category (land loser category) while making appointment to the post of Office Assistant

registered himself with 2nd respondent / employment exchange under the category of MBC priority category, after having passed SSLC examination. It appears that ... However, the petitioner, who has passed 10th standard was sponsored under BC priority category. Therefore, the 1st respondent appointed the 3rd respondent under MBC category

that the first respondent has sponsored 1020 eligible candidates belonging to BC Non- Priority registered upto 30.06.1993 for the vacancies of 51 posts ... dates of seniority 30.06.1993 and 12.07.1995 for the categories of BC and OC Non-Priority respectively. 4. Heard Both sides. 5. The age limit

that the third respondent has sponsored 1020 eligible candidates belonging to BC Non- Priority registered upto 30.06.1993 for the vacancies of 51 posts ... dates of seniority 30.06.1993 and 12.07.1995 for the categories of BC and OC Non-Priority respectively. 4. Heard Both sides. 5. The age limit

sponsored by the District Employment Office under the Land Acquisition priority BC candidate for the post of Graduate Assistant for Direct Recruitment for the year

rank. Petitioner was selected in OC general category as well as BC priority. 3. On 25.10.2002 petitioner was called upon for certificate verification. As there

applied for the post of Laboratory Assistant on 02.04.2015 under the BC non priority category and having participated in the written examination secured 120 marks ... before this Court indicating the fact that any person belonging to BC non priority category, who secured less mark or equal mark has been selected

appointed as Foreman Grade-II in the appellant Corporation under BC-Priority-Woman quota by order dated 31.01.2011. She was sponsored by the Commissioner