Section 214 in The Indian Succession Act, 1925 [Entire Act]
certificate granted under Bombay Regulation No. VIII of 1827, and, if granted after the first day of May, 1889 having the debt specified therein
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 66896 (0.26 seconds)Section 19 in The Court-fees Act, 1870 [Entire Act]
administration, [and, save as regards debts and securities, a certificate under Bombay Regulation 8 of 1827] [Substituted by Act 7 of 1889, Section
Section 4 in The Bombay Revenue Jurisdiction Act, 1876 [Entire Act]
Governor of Bombay in Council under Bombay Act No. II of 1863, section one, clause first, or. Bombay Act No. VII of 1803, section ... adjudication duly passed by a competent officer under Bombay Regulation 17 of 1827, chapter X, or under Act No. 11 of 1852, which declares
Section 4 in The Provident Funds Act, 1925 [Entire Act]
Succession Certificate Act, 1889, (7 of 1889.) or under the Bombay Regulation VIII of 1827, entitling the holder thereof to receive payment of such
Section 5 in The Provident Funds Act, 1925 [Entire Act]
Indian Succession Act, 1925, (39 of 1925.) or the Bombay Regulation VIII of 1827, any person, who becomes entitled as aforesaid, may be granted
Section 390 in The Indian Succession Act, 1925 [Entire Act]
Indian Succession Act, 1925
390. Provisions with respect to certificates under Bombay Regulation VIII of 1827.—
Notwithstanding anything in Bombay Regulation No.VIII
Section 6 in The Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937 [Entire Act]
provisions of this Act, namely:— (1) Section 26 of the Bombay Regulation IV of 1827; (2) Section 16 of the Madras Civil Courts
Section 215 in The Indian Succession Act, 1925 [Entire Act]
under the Succession Certificate Act, 1889 (7 of 1889)1, or Bombay Regulation No.VIII of 1827, in respect of any debts or securities included
In Re: Anthony Fernandes And Ors. vs Unknown on 12 October, 1992
issue of heirship certificate from this Court under Clause 3 of Bombay Regulation VIII of 1827 in form prescribed in Appendix 'B' thereto ... Judge of Bombay City Civil Court at Bombay, held that the petition was not maintainable in the Bombay City Civil Court at Bombay
Umaji Keshao Meshram And Ors. vs Radhikabai, Widow Of Anandrao ... on 14 March, 1986
Umaji Keshao Meshram And Ors. vs Radhikabai, Widow Of Anandrao ... on 14 March, 1986
Equivalent