Ms.Anita Nagindas Parekh & Ors vs Dr.Anil C. Pinto .. .. .. Defenda Nt S on 10 November, 2008
Ms.Anita Nagindas Parekh & Ors vs Dr.Anil C. Pinto .. .. .. Defenda Nt S on
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 528 (1.05 seconds)Mr. Sakil Mohammed Vakil Khan vs Dr. Miss Perin Irani & Others on 1 February, 1999
brain. Medical papers refer that the patient went into prolonged hypertension during the said surgery which resulted in the brain damage. The patient ... that brain is the most sensitive organ in human body and oxygen deprivation or even diminished oxygen supply can cause irreversible brain damage, which
00Pesh Raashmikant Shah Through ... vs M/S Elegant Industries, Pvt.Ltd on 21 November, 2014
suffered a severe brain damage. The injury to brain is non-
progressive brain damage, technically called cerebral palsy. The
line of treatment in case ... claimant. He also agreed that the
claimant has cerebral brain damage. Even in paragraph 9 of the
written submissions filed by the insurer
Umakant K.Mane vs The Dean, Rajawadi Mun. Hospital And Ors on 21 December, 2015
operation under general anaesthetic, a patient in the
recovery ward sustained brain damage caused by bypoxia for a period of
four to five minutes
Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co.Ltd vs Mr. Karan Pratap Maniar Thr. Next Friend ... on 13 June, 2023
submit that Respondent No.1 is a paralytic having suffered
traumatic brain damage resulting in paralysis which is permanent
avk 1/2
::: Uploaded
Kisan Dhondiba Kandge & 2 Ors vs The State Of Maharashtra on 16 July, 2020
saggital suture.
6. Brain coverings lacerated in left parietal region in an
area 4 X5 cm.
7. Left parietal lobe of brain contused, lacerated ... found present.
External injuries Nos. 1 to 5 can lead to brain damage mentioned in the
internal injuries and in his opinion death
Mayur Keshavrao Thamke vs State Of Mah. Thr. Pso Ps Wardha (City) ... on 17 November, 2025
admitted that he did not find a skull fracture or brain damage, nor did he use
the term "fatal injury" in the original
The State Of Maharashtra vs Ramrao Vitthal Dalve & Ors on 17 January, 2018
chest. The
cross-examination was directed to show that due to brain damage, the
patient was not in a position to speak, but both
The State Of Maharashtra vs Ramrao Vitthal Dalve & Ors on 17 January, 2018
chest. The
cross-examination was directed to show that due to brain damage, the
patient was not in a position to speak, but both
Kailas Sakharam Koli vs The State Of Maharashtra on 26 September, 2017
categorically deposed that P.W.No.1 Pratibha has suffered
permanent brain damage because of injury No.3 caused to her in
the incident ... 2017 00:34:27 :::
(275)APEALNo.1942016 (J)
permanent brain damage in the incident and she was unconscious
from 14/10/2012