findings rather than detailing proposed recommendations in
relation to issues such as causation and the imposition (or
otherwise) of measures.
16.1 It was submitted that
Ramabhai, PW-18, having omitted the factum as to
the manner of causation of injuries to her in her statement
under section
uncalled for emphasis.
21.4. (iv) No presumption can be attached to deliberate
causation of delay but, gross negligence on the part of the
counsel
uncalled for emphasis.
21.4. (iv) No presumption can be attached to deliberate
causation of delay but, gross negligence on the part of the
counsel
uncalled for emphasis.
21.4. (iv) No presumption can be attached to deliberate
causation of delay but, gross negligence on the part of the
counsel
uncalled for emphasis.
21.4. (iv) No presumption can be attached to deliberate
causation of delay but, gross negligence on the part of the
counsel
uncalled for emphasis.
21.4. (iv) No presumption can be attached to deliberate
causation of delay but, gross negligence on the part of the
counsel
that it is only
the tanker driver who was responsible for the causation of the
accident and hence, the Tribunal did not commit any error
suggests that the driver of the truck was solely responsible for
the causation of the accident. Under the circumstances, the
Tribunal was not justified
fault on the part
of the driver of the truck in the causation of the accident. It was,
accordingly, urged that the appeals being devoid
