Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

uncalled for emphasis. 21.4. (iv) No presumption can be attached to deliberate causation of delay but, gross negligence on the part of the counsel

judgment will also not render a cause for interference  in   revision   unless   causation   of   grave   injustice   or  miscarriage of justice is demonstrated.   7. In absence

gross negligence, inaction or default. There is also no presumption to deliberate causation of delay, and lack of bonafides cannot be inferred only

uncalled for emphasis. 21.4. (iv) No presumption can be attached to deliberate causation of delay but, gross negligence on the part of the counsel

uncalled for emphasis. (iv) No presumption can be attached to deliberate causation of delay but, gross negligence on the part of the Counsel or litigant

uncalled for emphasis. iv) No presumption can be attached to deliberate causation of delay but, gross negligence on the part of the counsel or litigant

uncalled for emphasis. iv)No presumption can be attached to deliberate causation of delay but, gross negligence on the part of the counsel or litigant

2014 JUDGMENT of justice or the causation of persistent disturbance  by the accused.   It is argued that none of the said  contingencies were recorded ... eventuality of the  Court deeming presence of the accused unnecessary or  finds   causation   of   persistent   disturbances   by   the  accused. That was not the prosecution case

uncalled for emphasis. (iv) No presumption can be attached to deliberate causation of delay but, gross negligence on the part of the Counsel or litigant

uncalled for emphasis. 21.4 (iv) No presumption can be attached to deliberate causation of delay but, gross negligence on the part of the counsel