order dated 29.06.2018 passed
by the Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum, Nashik (CGRF) in
proceeding bearing no.648/38/17/18/116.
3. The brief facts ... 2012. Being further aggrieved, the respondent approached the
Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum (CGRF), Nashik. The CGRF, after
hearing both sides, partly allowed the grievance
aggrieved by the
order dated 04.05.2016, passed by Consumer Grievance Redressal
Forum (CGRF), Aurangabad Zone, MSEDCL, Aurangabad in Case
Tauseef ... 9470.2016-J
No.CGRF/AZ/AUR/R/577/2016/08.
4. Brief facts of the case:-
(i). The Petitioner is authority constituted under
order dated
2/8/2018, passed by learned Consumer Grievances Redressal Forum
(CGRF for short) in Consumer Complaint No.9/2018, whereby the
learned CGRF ... respondent is a consumer and a complainant who
filed complaint before the (CGRF). He submitted that, on
1/3/2013, the respondent submitted an application
petitioner left with no other remedy approached Consumer
Grievance Redressal Forum ('CGRF') and filed complaint dated
07.07.2025. CGRF registered ... 2025-26, Hyderabad Central
Circle and vide award dated 15.09.2025, the CGRF rejected the complaint
stating that there are no proper documents and there
ledger balance. The petitioner
approached Consumer Grievances Redressal Forum-2 (CGRF-2),
challenging the order passed by the DE, Charminar by preferring ... Hyderabad South Circle. An award was passed vide
Order dated 31.05.2025 by CGRF to the effect that complaint is regarding
non-implementation of High Court
dated 28th June, 2016
passed by Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum (in short CGRF) with
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Appeal No. 30 of 2022 Page 2 of 26
further direction ... bill in
consonance with the said order dated 28th June, 2016 of CGRF. Vide said
order, the Commission has disposed off the petition as having
complainant had filed a
case with the Consumer Grievances Redressal Forum (CGRF) in 2013. The Forum
ruled in his favor, directing the department to drop ... plea.
4. The District Commission failed to consider the finding of the CGRF that the
complainant had unauthorisedly installed rotary switch for uninterrupted power
supply
Being further
aggrieved, the respondent approached the Consumer Grievance Redressal
Forum (CGRF), Latur. The CGRF, after hearing both sides, partly allowed
the grievance and directed ... Electricity Ombudsman, Nagpur.
The petitioner appeared and supported the order of CGRF, Latur. The
Electricity Ombudsman, Nagpur, by the impugned order, directed the
petitioner
dated 14 th
July 2017 passed by the Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum (CGRF). This
Forum has been established as per the notification issued by MERC ... under
the Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission (CGRF and
Ombudsman) Regulations 2006 to redress the grievances of consumers vide
powers conferred on the MERC by Section
dated 14 th
July 2017 passed by the Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum (CGRF). This
Forum has been established as per the notification issued by MERC ... under
the Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission (CGRF and
Ombudsman) Regulations 2006 to redress the grievances of consumers vide
powers conferred on the MERC by Section
